Gebara O C, Mittleman M A, Sutherland P, Lipinska I, Matheney T, Xu P, Welty F K, Wilson P W, Levy D, Muller J E
Institute for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Deaconess Hospital, Boston, Mass 02215.
Circulation. 1995 Apr 1;91(7):1952-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1952.
Although extensive evidence indicates that estrogen is responsible for the markedly decreased cardiovascular risk of premenopausal women, the mechanism through which estrogen might exert its protective effect has not been adequately explained. Since thrombosis is now recognized to play an important role in the onset of cardiovascular disease, we investigated the relation between estrogen status and fibrinolytic potential, a determinant of thrombotic risk.
We determined levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) antigen and tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) antigen in 1431 subjects from the Framingham Offspring Study. Fibrinolytic potential was compared between subjects with high estrogen status (premenopausal women and postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy) and low estrogen status (men and postmenopausal women not receiving hormone replacement therapy). In all comparisons, subjects with high estrogen status had greater fibrinolytic potential (lower PAI-1 levels) than subjects with low estrogen status. First, postmenopausal women receiving estrogen replacement therapy had lower levels of PAI-1 than those not receiving therapy (13.0 +/- 0.5 versus 19.5 +/- 1.0 ng/mL, P < .001). Second, premenopausal women had lower levels of PAI-1 than men of a similar age (14.8 +/- 0.6 versus 20.3 +/- 0.8 ng/mL, P < .001); this sex difference diminished when postmenopausal women not receiving hormone replacement therapy were compared with men of a similar age (19.6 +/- 0.7 versus 21.1 +/- 0.7 ng/mL, P = .089). Third, premenopausal women had markedly lower levels of PAI-1 antigen than postmenopausal women not receiving estrogen therapy (14.8 +/- 0.6 versus 19.5 +/- 1.0 ng/mL, P < .001). The between-group differences observed for TPA antigen were similar to those for PAI-1 antigen.
Each of these comparisons indicates that the cardioprotective effect of estrogen may be mediated, in part, by an increase in fibrinolytic potential. These findings might provide at least a partial explanation for the protection against cardiovascular disease experienced by premenopausal women, and the loss of that protection following menopause.
尽管大量证据表明雌激素是绝经前女性心血管疾病风险显著降低的原因,但其发挥保护作用的机制尚未得到充分解释。由于目前已认识到血栓形成在心血管疾病发病中起重要作用,我们研究了雌激素状态与纤维蛋白溶解潜能(血栓形成风险的一个决定因素)之间的关系。
我们测定了弗雷明汉后代研究中1431名受试者的纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂(PAI - 1)抗原和组织纤溶酶原激活物(TPA)抗原水平。比较了高雌激素状态(绝经前女性和接受激素替代疗法的绝经后女性)和低雌激素状态(男性和未接受激素替代疗法的绝经后女性)受试者的纤维蛋白溶解潜能。在所有比较中,高雌激素状态的受试者比低雌激素状态的受试者具有更高的纤维蛋白溶解潜能(PAI - 1水平更低)。首先,接受雌激素替代疗法的绝经后女性PAI - 1水平低于未接受治疗的女性(13.0±0.5对19.5±1.0 ng/mL,P <.001)。其次,绝经前女性的PAI - 1水平低于同龄男性(14.8±0.6对20.3±0.8 ng/mL,P <.001);当将未接受激素替代疗法的绝经后女性与同龄男性进行比较时,这种性别差异减小(19.6±0.7对21.1±0.7 ng/mL,P = 0.089)。第三,绝经前女性的PAI - 1抗原水平明显低于未接受雌激素治疗的绝经后女性(14.8±0.6对19.5±1.0 ng/mL,P <.001)。观察到的TPA抗原的组间差异与PAI - 1抗原的相似。
这些比较中的每一项都表明,雌激素的心脏保护作用可能部分是由纤维蛋白溶解潜能的增加介导的。这些发现可能至少部分解释了绝经前女性对心血管疾病的保护作用以及绝经后这种保护作用的丧失。