Guyuron B, Vaughan C
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995 Jan-Feb;19(1):75-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00209314.
This prospective study was designed to evaluate the immediate postoperative course and long-term efficacy of septal stents. In 20 patients who underwent primary septorhinoplasty, Doyle II silicone stents were inserted bilaterally parallel to the septum. The stents were removed after an average of 3.3 days. A hollow tube was designed into this particular stent in an attempt to minimize patients discomfort from nasal airway obstruction. Subjective ratings of airway improvement were very similar for patients whose septums were supported with nasal stents and for those patients from our 1989 study whose noses were treated with nasal packing. However, the number of patients who complained about discomfort was substantially higher in the stent group, 60% (12 of 20), compared with the nasal packing group, 22% (5 of 23 patients) (p < 0.05). The percentage of partial residual or recurrent septal deviation was also slightly higher in the stent group, 25% (5 of 20), than in the packing group, 13% (3 of 23 patients), but this was not statistically significant (p > 0.50). The alar base incision was partially dehisced during removal of the stent in one patient, in spite of a routine reduction in the width of the splint.
本前瞻性研究旨在评估鼻中隔支架术后即刻过程及长期疗效。20例行初次鼻中隔成形术的患者,双侧平行于鼻中隔插入多伊尔II型硅胶支架。平均3.3天后取出支架。该特殊支架设计有中空管,试图将患者因鼻气道阻塞引起的不适降至最低。使用鼻支架支撑鼻中隔的患者与我们1989年研究中使用鼻腔填塞治疗的患者相比,气道改善的主观评分非常相似。然而,支架组抱怨不适的患者数量显著高于鼻腔填塞组,分别为60%(20例中的12例)和22%(23例患者中的5例)(p<0.05)。支架组部分残留或复发性鼻中隔偏曲的百分比也略高于填塞组,分别为25%(20例中的5例)和13%(23例患者中的3例),但差异无统计学意义(p>0.50)。尽管常规缩小了夹板宽度,但1例患者在取出支架时鼻翼基底切口部分裂开。