van Veldhuisen D J, Man in 't Veld A J, Dunselman P H, Lok D J, Dohmen H J, Poortermans J C, Withagen A J, Pasteuning W H, Brouwer J, Lie K I
Department of Cardiology/Thoraxcenter, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Nov 15;22(6):1564-73. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90579-p.
This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the orally active dopamine agonist ibopamine in patients with mild to moderate chronic congestive heart failure and to compare the results with those of treatment with digoxin and placebo.
Ibopamine and digoxin are drugs that exert hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects. Because there is accumulating evidence that progression of disease in chronic heart failure is related not only to hemodynamic but also to neurohumoral factors, both drugs might be expected to have a favorable long-term effect.
We studied 161 patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure (80% in New York Heart Association functional class II and 20% in class III), who were treated with ibopamine (n = 53), digoxin (n = 55) or placebo (n = 53) for 6 months. Background therapy consisted of furosemide (0 to 80 mg); all other drugs for heart failure were excluded. Clinical assessments were made at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months.
Of the 161 patients, 128 (80%) completed the study. Compared with placebo, digoxin but not ibopamine significantly increased exercise time after 6 months (p = 0.008 by intention to treat analysis). Ibopamine was only effective in patients with relatively preserved left ventricular function, as it significantly increased exercise time in this subgroup (for patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction > 0.30; p = 0.018 vs. placebo). No patient receiving digoxin withdrew from the study because of progression of heart failure, compared with six patients receiving ibopamine and two receiving placebo. At 6 months, plasma norepinephrine was decreased with digoxin and ibopamine therapy (-106 and -13 pg/ml, respectively) but increased with placebo administration (+62 pg/ml) (both p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Plasma aldosterone was unaffected, but renin was decreased by both agents after 6 months (p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Total mortality and ambulatory arrhythmias were not significantly affected by the two drugs.
Ibopamine and digoxin both inhibit neurohumoral activation in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. However, the clinical effects of these drugs are different and appear to be related to the degree of left ventricular dysfunction.
本研究旨在确定口服活性多巴胺激动剂异波帕胺对轻至中度慢性充血性心力衰竭患者进行长期治疗的疗效和安全性,并将结果与地高辛及安慰剂治疗的结果进行比较。
异波帕胺和地高辛是具有血流动力学和神经体液效应的药物。由于越来越多的证据表明慢性心力衰竭疾病进展不仅与血流动力学因素有关,还与神经体液因素有关,因此预计这两种药物都可能具有良好的长期效果。
我们研究了161例轻至中度慢性心力衰竭患者(纽约心脏协会心功能分级II级占80%,III级占20%),这些患者接受异波帕胺(n = 53)、地高辛(n = 55)或安慰剂(n = 53)治疗6个月。基础治疗包括速尿(0至80 mg);排除所有其他治疗心力衰竭的药物。在基线以及治疗1、3和6个月后进行临床评估。
161例患者中,128例(80%)完成了研究。与安慰剂相比,地高辛而非异波帕胺在6个月后显著增加了运动时间(意向性治疗分析p = 0.008)。异波帕胺仅在左心室功能相对保留的患者中有效,因为它在该亚组中显著增加了运动时间(左心室射血分数> 0.30的患者;与安慰剂相比p = 0.018)。与6例接受异波帕胺治疗和2例接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,没有接受地高辛治疗的患者因心力衰竭进展而退出研究。在6个月时,地高辛和异波帕胺治疗使血浆去甲肾上腺素降低(分别为-106和-13 pg/ml),但安慰剂给药使其升高(+62 pg/ml)(与安慰剂相比均p < 0.05)。血浆醛固酮未受影响,但两种药物在6个月后均使肾素降低(与安慰剂相比p < 0.05)。两种药物对总死亡率和动态心律失常无显著影响。
异波帕胺和地高辛均能抑制轻至中度慢性心力衰竭患者的神经体液激活。然而,这些药物的临床效果不同,且似乎与左心室功能障碍程度有关。