Lancet. 1994 Mar 19;343(8899):687-91.
Warfarin is an established treatment for prevention of ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, but the value of this agent relative to aspirin in unclear. In the first Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF-I) study, direct comparison of warfarin with aspirin was limited by the small number of thromboembolic events. SPAF-II aims to address this issue and also to assess the differential effects of the two treatments according to age. We compared warfarin (prothrombin time ratio 1.3-1.8, international normalised ratio 2.0-4.5) with aspirin 325 mg daily for prevention of ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism (primary events) in two parallel randomised trials involving 715 patients aged 75 years or less and 385 patients older than 75; we sought reductions in the absolute rate of primary events by warfarin compared with aspirin of 2% per year and 4% per year, respectively. In the younger patients, warfarin decreased the absolute rate of primary events by 0.7% per year (95% CI-0.4 to 1.7). The primary event rate per year was 1.3% with warfarin and 1.9% with aspirin (relative risk [RR] 0.67, p = 0.24). The absolute rate of primary events in low-risk younger patients (without hypertension, recent heart failure, or previous thromboembolism) on aspirin was 0.5% per year (95% CI 0.1 to 1.9). Among older patients, warfarin decreased the absolute rate of primary events by 1.2% per year (95% CI-1.7 to 4.1). The primary event rate per year was 3.6% with warfarin and 4.8% with aspirin (RR 0.73, p = 0.39). In this older group, the rate of all stroke with residual deficit (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) was 4.3% per year with aspirin and 4.6% per year with warfarin (RR 1.1). Warfarin may be more effective than aspirin for prevention of ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, but the absolute reduction in stroke rate by warfarin is small. Younger patients without risk factors had a low rate of stroke when treated with aspirin. In older patients the rate of stroke (ischaemic and haemorrhagic) was substantial, irrespective of which agent was given. Patient age and the inherent risk of thromboembolism should be considered in the choice of antithrombotic prophylaxis for patients with atrial fibrillation.
华法林是预防心房颤动患者缺血性卒中的一种既定疗法,但该药物相对于阿司匹林的价值尚不清楚。在第一项心房颤动卒中预防(SPAF - I)研究中,华法林与阿司匹林的直接比较因血栓栓塞事件数量较少而受到限制。SPAF - II旨在解决这一问题,并根据年龄评估两种治疗方法的差异效果。我们在两项平行随机试验中,将华法林(凝血酶原时间比值1.3 - 1.8,国际标准化比值2.0 - 4.5)与每日325毫克阿司匹林进行比较,以预防缺血性卒中和全身性栓塞(主要事件),这两项试验分别纳入了715名75岁及以下的患者和385名75岁以上的患者;我们试图使华法林与阿司匹林相比,主要事件的绝对发生率每年分别降低2%和4%。在较年轻的患者中,华法林使主要事件的绝对发生率每年降低0.7%(95%可信区间 - 0.4至1.7)。华法林治疗组每年的主要事件发生率为1.3%,阿司匹林治疗组为1.9%(相对风险[RR] 0.67,p = 0.24)。服用阿司匹林的低风险年轻患者(无高血压、近期心力衰竭或既往血栓栓塞史)每年的主要事件绝对发生率为0.5%(95%可信区间0.1至1.9)。在老年患者中,华法林使主要事件的绝对发生率每年降低1.2%(95%可信区间 - 1.7至4.1)。华法林治疗组每年的主要事件发生率为3.6%,阿司匹林治疗组为4.8%(RR 0.73,p = 0.39)。在这个老年组中,阿司匹林治疗组每年所有伴有残留神经功能缺损(缺血性或出血性)的卒中发生率为4.3%,华法林治疗组为4.6%(RR 1.1)。对于预防心房颤动患者的缺血性卒中,华法林可能比阿司匹林更有效,但华法林使卒中发生率的绝对降低幅度较小。无危险因素的年轻患者服用阿司匹林时卒中发生率较低。在老年患者中,无论使用哪种药物,卒中(缺血性和出血性)发生率都很高。在为心房颤动患者选择抗血栓预防措施时,应考虑患者年龄和血栓栓塞的固有风险。