Suppr超能文献

短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度卒中后非风湿性心房颤动的二级预防。欧洲心房颤动试验(EAFT)研究组

Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) Study Group.

出版信息

Lancet. 1993 Nov 20;342(8882):1255-62.

PMID:7901582
Abstract

Several studies have established the value of anticoagulation for primary prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (NRAF). However, in patients with a recent transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor ischaemic stroke the preventive benefit of anticoagulation or aspirin remains unclear. Physicians in 108 centres from 13 countries collaborated to study this question. 1007 NRAF patients with a recent TIA or minor ischaemic stroke were randomised to open anticoagulation or double-blind treatment with either 300 mg aspirin per day or placebo (group 1, 669). Patients with contraindications to anticoagulation were randomised to receive aspirin or placebo (group 2,338). The measure of outcome was death from vascular disease, any stroke, myocardial infarction, or systemic embolism. During mean follow-up of 2.3 years, the annual rate of outcome events was 8% in patients assigned to anticoagulants vs 17% in placebo-treated patients in group 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.79). The risk of stroke alone was reduced from 12% to 4% per year (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.20-0.57). Among all patients assigned to aspirin (groups 1 and 2), the annual incidence of outcome events was 15%, against 19% in those on placebo (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.65-1.05). Anticoagulation was significantly more effective than aspirin (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.41-0.87). The incidence of major bleeding events was low, both on anticoagulation (2.8% per year) and on aspirin (0.9% per year). No intracranial bleeds were identified in patients assigned to anticoagulation. We conclude that anticoagulation is effective in reducing the risk of recurrent vascular events in NRAF patients with a recent TIA or minor ischaemic stroke. In absolute terms: 90 vascular events (mainly strokes) are prevented if 1000 patients are treated with anticoagulation for one year. Aspirin is a safe, though less effective, alternative when anticoagulation is contraindicated; it prevents 40 vascular events each year for every 1000 treated patients.

摘要

多项研究已证实抗凝治疗对于非风湿性心房颤动(NRAF)患者预防血栓栓塞事件具有重要价值。然而,对于近期发生短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或轻度缺血性卒中的患者,抗凝治疗或使用阿司匹林的预防效果仍不明确。来自13个国家108个中心的医生合作研究了这一问题。1007例近期发生TIA或轻度缺血性卒中的NRAF患者被随机分为接受开放抗凝治疗组,或接受每日300毫克阿司匹林双盲治疗组或安慰剂组(第1组,669例)。有抗凝治疗禁忌证的患者被随机分为接受阿司匹林或安慰剂组(第2组,338例)。观察指标为血管性疾病死亡、任何类型的卒中、心肌梗死或全身性栓塞。在平均2.3年的随访期内,第1组中接受抗凝治疗的患者结局事件年发生率为8%,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者为17%(风险比[HR] 0.53;95%置信区间[CI] 0.36 - 0.79)。仅卒中风险就从每年12%降至4%(HR 0.34;95% CI 0.20 - 0.57)。在所有被分配接受阿司匹林治疗的患者(第1组和第2组)中,结局事件的年发生率为15%,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者为19%(HR 0.83;95% CI 0.65 - 1.05)。抗凝治疗明显比阿司匹林更有效(HR 0.60;95% CI 0.41 - 0.87)。严重出血事件的发生率较低,抗凝治疗组为每年2.8%,阿司匹林组为每年0.9%。接受抗凝治疗的患者未发现颅内出血。我们得出结论,抗凝治疗可有效降低近期发生TIA或轻度缺血性卒中的NRAF患者复发性血管事件的风险。从绝对数值来看:如果1000例患者接受一年的抗凝治疗,可预防90例血管事件(主要是卒中)。当抗凝治疗禁忌时,阿司匹林是一种安全但效果较差的替代药物;每1000例接受治疗的患者每年可预防40例血管事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验