Osborne M, Evans T W
Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.
Lancet. 1994 Mar 26;343(8900):778-80. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91845-7.
The USA and the UK have differed substantially in approaches to health care and especially in intensive care provision. We have compared the health care systems, clinical justification for intensive care, selection of patients likely to benefit from such care, and the performance of the systems. The differences are lessening. Both countries are moving away from clinical autonomy as the driving force of medical decision-making. There is increasing recognition that not all patients will benefit from intensive care and that the doctor's obligation to the patient can be limited by constraints set by society.
美国和英国在医疗保健方法上,尤其是在重症监护服务方面存在很大差异。我们比较了两国的医疗保健系统、重症监护的临床依据、可能从这种治疗中受益的患者的选择以及系统的运行情况。这些差异正在缩小。两国都在摒弃将临床自主权作为医疗决策驱动力的做法。人们越来越认识到,并非所有患者都能从重症监护中受益,而且医生对患者的责任可能会受到社会所设定限制的约束。