Pashos C L, Normand S L, Garfinkle J B, Newhouse J P, Epstein A M, McNeil B J
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Apr;23(5):1023-30. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90585-1.
In this study, we investigated the use of thrombolytic agents and other cardiac drugs in a national cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction and assessed the influence of large clinical studies on types of thrombolytic therapy prescribed.
Information about usage patterns for these drugs is unavailable, and little is known about the impact of large clinical trials on their use.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 65,011 patients who were treated for acute myocardial infarction during fiscal years 1988 to 1992 (October 1, 1987 to September 30, 1992) in hospitals participating in the SMS Corporation's on-line data pool.
The overall thrombolysis rate for patients with acute myocardial infarction increased from 11% in fiscal year 1988 to 18% in fiscal year 1990 and has remained approximately at that level since then. In mid-1989, tissue plasminogen activator was used in 90% of the patients receiving thrombolysis, whereas streptokinase was used in only 10%. Since 1991, tissue plasminogen activator has been used in 60% of patients and streptokinase in almost 30%. Much of this change came after presentation and publication of results of the Second Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio Della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI-2) and the Third International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS-3) trials. Over these 5 years, use of beta-adrenergic blocking agents increased steadily, and use of calcium-channel blocking agents declined steadily.
Current usage rates of thrombolytic therapy are lower than expected, but trends in usage rates for beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers reflect their increasing and decreasing approval, respectively. Presentation and publication of results from the Third International Study of Infarct Survival and the Second Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio Della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico trials appear to have influenced the type of thrombolytic agent prescribed.
在本研究中,我们调查了全国急性心肌梗死患者队列中溶栓药物及其他心脏药物的使用情况,并评估了大型临床研究对所开具的溶栓治疗类型的影响。
关于这些药物使用模式的信息尚无可用资料,且对于大型临床试验对其使用的影响知之甚少。
我们对1988财年至1992财年(1987年10月1日至1992年9月30日)期间在参与SMS公司在线数据库的医院中接受急性心肌梗死治疗的65,011名患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。
急性心肌梗死患者的总体溶栓率从1988财年的11%增至1990财年的18%,此后一直维持在该水平左右。1989年年中,接受溶栓治疗的患者中有90%使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂,而仅10%使用链激酶。自1991年以来,60%的患者使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂,近30%的患者使用链激酶。这种变化很大程度上发生在第二项意大利心肌梗死存活研究(GISSI - 2)和第三项国际梗死存活研究(ISIS - 3)试验的结果公布之后。在这5年中,β - 肾上腺素能阻滞剂的使用稳步增加,而钙通道阻滞剂的使用稳步下降。
目前溶栓治疗的使用率低于预期,但β受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂的使用率趋势分别反映了它们获批情况的增加和减少。第三项国际梗死存活研究和第二项意大利心肌梗死存活研究试验结果的公布似乎影响了所开具的溶栓药物类型。