• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸直接粘结剂的剪切强度

Shear strength of orthodontic direct-bonding adhesives.

作者信息

Johnson W T, Hembree J H, Weber F N

出版信息

Am J Orthod. 1976 Nov;70(5):559-66. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(76)90280-3.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9416(76)90280-3
PMID:790973
Abstract

A total of 210 double-width stainless steel edgewise brackets with retentive lip bases were bonded to bovine incisors with seven commercially available direct-bonding materials. Ten samples for each of the seven direct-bonding materials were tested for shear strength using the Instron Universal Testing Instrument. The samples were tested after 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months of immersion in 30 per cent physiologic saline solution. The mean shear strength of each direct-bonding material at each time interval was compared statistically to the mean shear strength of each of the materials at each time interval with a matched 1 test. The same test was used to determine whether there had been a significant change in mean shear strength from start to finish of testing for each material. One product showed a significantly better mean shear strength than any other material at each test interval. The remaining materials were grouped in middle or low ranges, depending upon their final mean shear strengths and degrees of nonsignificance when compared to each other.

摘要

使用七种市售的直接粘结材料,将总共210个带有固位唇基底的双宽度不锈钢方丝弓托槽粘结到牛的切牙上。使用英斯特朗万能材料试验机对七种直接粘结材料中的每种材料的十个样本进行剪切强度测试。将样本在30%生理盐溶液中浸泡1天、1个月和3个月后进行测试。使用配对t检验,将每个时间间隔下每种直接粘结材料的平均剪切强度与每个时间间隔下每种材料的平均剪切强度进行统计学比较。使用相同的测试来确定每种材料从测试开始到结束时平均剪切强度是否有显著变化。在每个测试间隔中,有一种产品的平均剪切强度明显优于任何其他材料。其余材料根据其最终平均剪切强度以及相互比较时的不显著程度分为中等或低范围。

相似文献

1
Shear strength of orthodontic direct-bonding adhesives.正畸直接粘结剂的剪切强度
Am J Orthod. 1976 Nov;70(5):559-66. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(76)90280-3.
2
Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases.各种粘结附着基底的固位剪切强度。
Am J Orthod. 1980 Jun;77(6):669-78. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90158-x.
3
A comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of five different orthodontic bonding agents polymerized using halogen and light-emitting diode curing lights: an in vitro investigation.使用卤素灯和发光二极管固化灯聚合的五种不同正畸粘结剂的剪切粘结强度的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Sep-Oct;22(5):731-2. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.93469.
4
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to various esthetic pontic materials.正畸托槽与各种美学桥体材料黏结的抗剪粘结强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.031.
5
The crystal growth technique--a laboratory evaluation of bond strengths.晶体生长技术——粘结强度的实验室评估
Eur J Orthod. 1999 Feb;21(1):89-93. doi: 10.1093/ejo/21.1.89.
6
The evaluation of dual cement resins in orthodontic bonding.正畸粘结中双组分粘结树脂的评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 May;103(5):448-51. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81795-0.
7
Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report.剪切应力下陶瓷托槽的粘结强度:一项体外研究报告。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Sep;98(3):214-21. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81598-7.
8
Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded with different light-cured glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study.不同光固化玻璃离子水门汀粘结陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthod. 1998 Apr;20(2):177-87. doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.2.177.
9
Shear bond strength of a new polycarbonate bracket--an in vitro study with 14 adhesives.
Eur J Orthod. 1996 Jun;18(3):295-301. doi: 10.1093/ejo/18.3.295.
10
Does ozone water affect the bond strengths of orthodontic brackets?臭氧水会影响正畸托槽的粘结强度吗?
Aust Orthod J. 2010 May;26(1):73-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of shear bond strength of bonded stainless steel brackets using three different light curing systems: An study.使用三种不同光固化系统的粘结不锈钢托槽剪切粘结强度的比较:一项研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Mar 18;12:20. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_83_22. eCollection 2023.