Linn F H, Wijdicks E F, van der Graaf Y, Weerdesteyn-van Vliet F A, Bartelds A I, van Gijn J
University Department of Neurology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Lancet. 1994 Aug 27;344(8922):590-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91970-4.
Retrospective surveys of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage suggest that minor episodes with sudden headache (warning leaks) may precede rupture of an aneurysm, and that early recognition and surgery might lead to improved outcome. We studied 148 patients with sudden and severe headache (possible sentinel headache) seen by 252 general practitioners in a 5-year period in the Netherlands. Subarachnoid haemorrhage was the cause in 37 patients (25%) (proven aneurysm in 21, negative angiogram in 6, no angiogram done in 6, sudden headache followed by death in 4). 103 patients had headache as the only symptom, 12 of whom proved to have subarachnoid haemorrhage (6 with a ruptured aneurysm). Previous bouts of sudden headache had occurred in only 2. Other serious neurological conditions were diagnosed in 18. In the remaining 93, no underlying cause of headache was found; follow-up over 1 year showed no subsequent subarachnoid haemorrhage or sudden death. In this cohort, acute, severe headache in general practice indicated a serious neurological disorder in 37% (95% CI 29-45%), and subarachnoid haemorrhage in 25% (18-32%). 12% (5-18%) of those with headache as the only symptom. The notion of warning leaks as a less serious variant of subarachnoid haemorrhage is not supported by this study. Early recognition of subarachnoid haemorrhage is important but will probably have only limited impact on the outcome in the general population.
对蛛网膜下腔出血患者的回顾性调查表明,突发头痛的轻微发作(警示性渗漏)可能先于动脉瘤破裂,早期识别和手术可能会改善预后。我们研究了荷兰252名全科医生在5年期间接诊的148例突发剧烈头痛(可能为前驱头痛)患者。37例(25%)患者的病因是蛛网膜下腔出血(21例证实有动脉瘤,6例血管造影阴性,6例未进行血管造影,4例突发头痛后死亡)。103例患者仅以头痛为唯一症状,其中12例证实有蛛网膜下腔出血(6例动脉瘤破裂)。只有2例曾有过突发头痛发作。18例被诊断为其他严重神经系统疾病。其余93例未发现头痛的潜在病因;1年的随访显示,随后未发生蛛网膜下腔出血或猝死。在这个队列中,全科医疗中急性、剧烈头痛表明37%(95%CI 29 - 45%)患有严重神经系统疾病,25%(18 - 32%)患有蛛网膜下腔出血。仅以头痛为唯一症状的患者中,这一比例为12%(5 - 18%)。本研究不支持将警示性渗漏视为蛛网膜下腔出血较轻形式的观点。早期识别蛛网膜下腔出血很重要,但可能对普通人群的预后影响有限。