Sloan N L, Camacho L W, Rojas E P, Stern C
Population Council, New York, NY 10017.
Lancet. 1994 Sep 17;344(8925):782-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92341-8.
Because resources for care of low-birthweight (LBW) infants in developing countries are scarce, the Kangaroo mother method (KMM) was developed. The infant is kept upright in skin-to-skin contact with the mother's breast. Previous studies reported several benefits with the KMM but interpretation of their findings is limited by small size and design weaknesses. We have done a longitudinal, randomised, controlled trial at the Isidro Ayora Maternity Hospital in Quito, Ecuador. Infants with LBW (< 2000 g) who satisfied out-of-risk criteria of tolerance of food and weight stabilisation were randomly assigned to KMM and control (standard incubator care) groups (n = 128 and 147, respectively). During 6 months of follow-up the KMM group had a significantly lower rate than the control group of serious illness (lower-respiratory-tract disorders, apnoea, aspiration, pneumonia, septicaemia, general infections; 7 [5%] vs 27 [18%], p < 0.002), although differences between the groups in less severe morbidity were not significant. There was no significant difference in growth or in the proportion of women breastfeeding, perhaps because the proportion breastfeeding was high in both groups owing to strong promotion. Mortality was the same in both groups; most deaths occurred during the stabilisation period before randomisation. KMM mothers made more unscheduled clinic visits than control mothers but their infants had fewer re-admissions and so the cost of care was lower with the KMM. Since the eligibility criteria excluded nearly 50% of LBW infants from the study, the KMM is not universally applicable to these infants. The benefits might be greater in populations where breastfeeding is not so common.
由于发展中国家照顾低体重婴儿的资源稀缺,因此开发了袋鼠式护理法(KMM)。婴儿被竖着抱,与母亲的胸部进行皮肤接触。先前的研究报告了KMM的诸多益处,但这些研究结果的解读因样本量小和设计缺陷而受到限制。我们在厄瓜多尔基多的伊西德罗·阿约拉妇产医院进行了一项纵向随机对照试验。体重不足2000克且符合食物耐受性和体重稳定等无风险标准的低体重婴儿被随机分为KMM组和对照组(标准暖箱护理)(分别为128例和147例)。在6个月的随访期间,KMM组患重病(下呼吸道疾病、呼吸暂停、误吸、肺炎、败血症、全身感染)的发生率显著低于对照组(7例[5%]对27例[18%],p<0.002),尽管两组在较轻发病率方面的差异不显著。两组在生长或母乳喂养女性比例方面没有显著差异,这可能是因为由于大力推广,两组的母乳喂养比例都很高。两组的死亡率相同;大多数死亡发生在随机分组前的稳定期。KMM组的母亲进行的非计划门诊就诊比对照组的母亲多,但她们的婴儿再次入院的次数较少,因此KMM的护理成本较低。由于纳入标准将近50%的低体重婴儿排除在研究之外,KMM并不普遍适用于这些婴儿。在母乳喂养不那么普遍的人群中,其益处可能更大。