Cayse L N
Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, Manchester, MO.
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1994 Jul;11(3):102-8. doi: 10.1177/104345429401100304.
The purpose of this study was to identify the stressors and coping strategies of fathers with a child diagnosed with cancer. Differences in the fathers' stressors, feelings, and coping strategies by severity of their child's condition were also assessed. The Contingency Model of Long-Term Care was the framework for the study. The Parental Perception Inventory questionnaire was completed by 23 fathers. The fathers reported that their most common concern was their "child's future," followed by their "child's health." The most common coping strategy was "to pray," a strategy that was also reported as being the most helpful. The next most common strategies were "to get information," "look at options," and "to weigh choices." These strategies are problem-oriented which is consistent with the research findings of others. A one-way analysis of variance with planned comparisons was used to compare stressors, feelings, and coping strategies of the fathers by severity of their child's condition. No planned comparisons were statistically significant at the .05 level nor were any additional differences detected.
本研究的目的是确定孩子被诊断患有癌症的父亲的压力源和应对策略。同时还评估了父亲的压力源、感受和应对策略因孩子病情严重程度的差异。长期护理应急模型是该研究的框架。23位父亲完成了父母感知量表问卷。父亲们报告说,他们最常见的担忧是“孩子的未来”,其次是“孩子的健康”。最常见的应对策略是“祈祷”,这一策略也被报告为最有帮助的策略。接下来最常见的策略是“获取信息”“考虑选择”和“权衡抉择”。这些策略是以问题为导向的,这与其他研究结果一致。采用带有计划比较的单向方差分析来比较父亲的压力源、感受和应对策略因孩子病情严重程度的差异。在0.05的水平上,没有计划比较具有统计学意义,也没有检测到任何其他差异。