Lawry K W, Brouhard B H, Cunningham R J
Department of Pediatrics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195.
Pediatr Nephrol. 1994 Jun;8(3):326-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00866349.
Although previous studies have documented neuropsychological deficits in children with end-stage renal disease, few have evaluated and compared the cognitive functioning and the school performance of children with renal failure. The current study evaluated the influence of chronic renal failure on cognitive functioning and school performance in children and adolescents with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis and after renal transplantation. Participants were given standardized IQ and achievement tests to assess cognitive functioning and ability. Academic performance was determined by evaluating grades for the semester in which the testing was performed; a grade point average (GPA) was calculated based on a 4.0-point scale. The 11 dialysis patients and 13 transplant patients were comparable in age, race, sex, and socioeconomic status. Overall IQ and subtest scores demonstrated no differences between the two groups. Performance on the Woodcock-Johnson achievement tests showed that the transplant patients did better on achievement tests of written language (P = 0.04) and in school performance in English compared with dialysis patients (P < 0.05). Furthermore the dialysis patients tended to be below age and grade level in all areas, whereas the transplant patients were achieving at or above these levels. There were significant differences in the age equivalent scores between the dialysis and transplant patients in the areas of mathematics and written language (P < 0.05). However, when grades were evaluated there were no differences in overall GPA or in the mathematics GPA. Days absent were not different between the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
尽管先前的研究已经记录了终末期肾病患儿存在神经心理缺陷,但很少有研究评估和比较肾衰竭患儿的认知功能和学业表现。本研究评估了慢性肾衰竭对接受透析及肾移植的终末期肾病儿童和青少年的认知功能和学业表现的影响。研究对象接受了标准化的智商和成就测试,以评估认知功能和能力。学业成绩通过评估测试所在学期的成绩来确定;平均绩点(GPA)基于4.0分制计算。11名透析患者和13名移植患者在年龄、种族、性别和社会经济地位方面具有可比性。两组的总体智商和子测试分数没有差异。伍德科克-约翰逊成就测试的结果显示,与透析患者相比,移植患者在书面语言成就测试(P = 0.04)和英语学业表现方面表现更好(P < 0.05)。此外,透析患者在所有领域的年龄和年级水平往往低于正常水平,而移植患者达到或高于这些水平。透析患者和移植患者在数学和书面语言领域的年龄当量分数存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。然而,在评估成绩时,总体GPA或数学GPA没有差异。两组的缺勤天数没有差异。(摘要截短于250字)