• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人开放性与闭合性胆囊切除术死亡率比较:康涅狄格州全州调查

Comparison of mortality rates for open and closed cholecystectomy in the elderly: Connecticut statewide survey.

作者信息

Feldman M G, Russell J C, Lynch J T, Mattie A

机构信息

St. Vincent Hospital, Bridgeport, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Jun;4(3):165-72. doi: 10.1089/lps.1994.4.165.

DOI:10.1089/lps.1994.4.165
PMID:7919503
Abstract

The objective was to determine the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients 65 years of age and older with symptomatic uncomplicated chronic gallbladder disease by comparing the mortality rate with open cholecystectomy. Connecticut Hospital Information Management Exchange and the Connecticut Society of American Board of Surgeons established a Connecticut Laparoscopic Registry made up of 33 acute care hospitals. A cohort longitudinal retrospective statewide registry collected data mortality rates on all 2865 elderly patients undergoing open (OC) or closed (LC) cholecystectomy for uncomplicated chronic cholecystitis. A database was established and continuously monitored from October 1, 1988, to December 31, 1992. Seven hundred sixty-one patients over 65 years of age underwent open cholecystectomy for uncomplicated chronic cholecystectomy during fiscal year 1989, with a mortality rate of 1.4%. The mortality rate of a similar cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during fiscal years 1991 and 1992 was 0.3% and 0.6%, respectively. The mortality rate was further broken down into age subsets 65-69, 70-79, and 80+. The prelaparoscopic era (FY 1989) age subsets were compared with those of the laparoscopic era (FY 1991 and 1992). A statistically significant reduction (p = 0.01) in mortality rate was noted in the 70-79 age group following laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly for the treatment of symptomatic, uncomplicated chronic cholecystitis is as safe if not safer than open cholecystectomy as measured by mortality rate.

摘要

目的是通过比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的死亡率,来确定65岁及以上有症状的非复杂性慢性胆囊疾病患者进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性。康涅狄格医院信息管理交换中心和康涅狄格美国外科医师委员会建立了一个由33家急症护理医院组成的康涅狄格腹腔镜注册中心。一个队列纵向回顾性全州注册中心收集了所有2865例因非复杂性慢性胆囊炎接受开腹(OC)或腹腔镜(LC)胆囊切除术的老年患者的死亡率数据。建立了一个数据库,并从1988年10月1日至1992年12月31日持续监测。1989财政年度,761例65岁以上患者因非复杂性慢性胆囊炎接受了开腹胆囊切除术,死亡率为1.4%。1991年和1992年财政年度,类似队列的患者接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的死亡率分别为0.3%和0.6%。死亡率进一步细分为65 - 69岁、70 - 79岁和80岁以上年龄组。将腹腔镜手术前时代(1989财政年度)的年龄组与腹腔镜时代(1991年和1992年财政年度)的年龄组进行比较。腹腔镜手术后,70 - 79岁年龄组的死亡率有统计学显著降低(p = 0.01)。从死亡率衡量,老年患者进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗有症状的非复杂性慢性胆囊炎即使不比开腹胆囊切除术更安全,至少也是同样安全的。

相似文献

1
Comparison of mortality rates for open and closed cholecystectomy in the elderly: Connecticut statewide survey.老年人开放性与闭合性胆囊切除术死亡率比较:康涅狄格州全州调查
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Jun;4(3):165-72. doi: 10.1089/lps.1994.4.165.
2
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A statewide experience. The Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry.腹腔镜胆囊切除术。全州范围的经验。康涅狄格州腹腔镜胆囊切除术登记处。
Arch Surg. 1993 May;128(5):494-8; discussion 498-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170024002.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center.单中心腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的比较
Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):459-65. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80941-9.
4
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis: retrospective study.老年急性胆囊炎患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的回顾性研究
Hong Kong Med J. 2002 Dec;8(6):394-9.
5
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: prospective trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:前瞻性试验。
World J Surg. 1997 Jun;21(5):540-5. doi: 10.1007/pl00012283.
6
A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy.一项基于人群的队列研究,比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Feb;97(2):334-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05466.x.
7
Bile duct injuries, 1989-1993. A statewide experience. Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry.1989 - 1993年胆管损伤。全州范围的经验。康涅狄格州腹腔镜胆囊切除术登记处。
Arch Surg. 1996 Apr;131(4):382-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430160040007.
8
Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis.腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术治疗急性坏疽性胆囊炎的随机试验
Lancet. 1998 Jan 31;351(9099):321-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08447-X.
9
Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland.马里兰州开腹和腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术率及手术死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 10;330(6):403-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300607.
10
Outcome study of cholecystectomy during pregnancy.
Am J Surg. 1999 Mar;177(3):232-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00007-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Chyle and Bile Leak Following Open Cholecystectomy: A Rare Complication.开腹胆囊切除术后乳糜漏和胆漏:一种罕见的并发症。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 30;16(4):e59338. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59338. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to the Open Procedure in Patients with Gallbladder Disease.胆囊疾病患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开放手术效果的系统评价和荟萃分析
Avicenna J Med. 2024 Feb 1;14(1):3-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777710. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
The Safety of Minimally Invasive and Open Cholecystectomy in Elderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review.
老年急性胆囊炎患者行微创与开腹胆囊切除术的安全性:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2022 Nov 6;14(11):e31170. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31170. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly: An Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Western Nepal.尼泊尔西部一家三级护理医院开展老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术的经验
Surg Res Pract. 2017;2017:8204578. doi: 10.1155/2017/8204578. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy in elderly patients.老年患者腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术的荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17626-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17626.
6
Cost-effectiveness of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus observation in older patients presenting with mild biliary disease.择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术与观察治疗老年轻度胆道疾病患者的成本效益分析
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Sep;18(9):1616-22. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2570-9. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
7
Failure to perform cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost.老年患者急性胆囊炎行胆囊切除术失败与发病率、死亡率和费用增加有关。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):668-77, 677-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.031.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients.老年患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术
JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):587-91. doi: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404604.
9
Unusual cases of acute cholecystitis and cholangitis: Tokyo Guidelines.急性胆囊炎和胆管炎的罕见病例:东京指南
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(1):98-113. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1162-9. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
10
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly.老年人的腹腔镜胆囊切除术
JSLS. 2005 Oct-Dec;9(4):408-10.