Schwartz M F, Saffran E M, Bloch D E, Dell G S
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141.
Brain Lang. 1994 Jul;47(1):52-88. doi: 10.1006/brln.1994.1042.
Two empirical studies are presented which seek to extend the parallels between disordered speech production in aphasia and in normals. Study 1 compares the rate and distribution of some theoretically interesting error types in a jargon aphasic and a normal error corpus. Study 2 is an investigation of how the error pattern of normal speakers evolves as utterances become more practiced. On the basis of these studies, we offer a hypothesis about the nature of the variation between more and less disordered systems. Our claim, which is developed in the context of spreading activation models of production, is that such variation is tied to the ability of the system to deliver activation to intended units, relative to that of unintended units, within the time required by the task at hand.
本文呈现了两项实证研究,旨在拓展失语症患者与正常人言语产生障碍之间的相似性。研究1比较了一名杂乱性失语症患者和一个正常错误语料库中一些理论上有趣的错误类型的发生率和分布情况。研究2调查了正常说话者的错误模式如何随着话语练习增多而演变。基于这些研究,我们提出了一个关于较少紊乱系统和较多紊乱系统之间差异本质的假设。我们的主张是在言语产生的扩散激活模型背景下提出的,即这种差异与系统在手头任务所需时间内将激活传递到目标单元相对于非目标单元的能力相关。