• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艰难梭菌毒素A的扩增流式细胞荧光免疫分析方法的开发与临床评估

Development and clinical evaluation of an amplified flow cytometric fluoroimmunoassay for Clostridium difficile toxin A.

作者信息

Renner E D

机构信息

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, VAMC, Fargo, North Dakota 58102.

出版信息

Cytometry. 1994 Jun 15;18(2):103-8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990180209.

DOI:10.1002/cyto.990180209
PMID:7924698
Abstract

A rapid (2 h) amplified flow cytometric fluoroimmunoassay (AFCF) for Clostridium difficile toxin A was developed and compared with the cytotoxin assay (CTA) and culture of the organism from stool specimens from patients with suspected C. difficile-associated gastrointestinal disease (CAD). For this assay polyclonal antitoxin A was attached to 10-microns diameter and monoclonal antitoxin A was attached to fluorescent 0.1 micron-diameter polystyrene microspheres. The microspheres and sample were reacted together as in a conventional double-antibody sandwich assay. However, laser flow cytometric measurement allowed the omission of separation and washing steps by gating on light scattered by the larger microspheres and measuring only the fluorescence associated with these particles. The amount of fluorescence from the attached 0.1 micron microspheres was dependent on the concentration of toxin A in the sample. The AFCF detected purified toxin A at levels of 1 pg/ml and was linear from 1 to 40 pg/ml. The AFCF was compared with the CTA and culture of C. difficile for clinical use by comparing results from 198 stool specimens from patients with suspected CAD. The AFCF was 85.7% sensitive and 95.8% specific relative to the CTA, and 85.2% sensitive and 98.3% specific compared to the culture assay. If the isolation of toxigenic C. difficile or the patients clinical course was considered indicative of CAD, the sensitivities of the AFCF, CTA, and culture assay were 77.4%, 67.7% and 96.8%, respectively. The AFCF demonstrated a specificity of 98.8%, while both CTA and culture had a specificity of 100%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

我们开发了一种用于艰难梭菌毒素A的快速(2小时)放大流式细胞荧光免疫测定法(AFCF),并将其与细胞毒素测定法(CTA)以及对疑似艰难梭菌相关性胃肠道疾病(CAD)患者粪便标本进行的该菌培养法进行比较。在该测定法中,多克隆抗毒素A附着于直径10微米的微球上,单克隆抗毒素A附着于荧光直径0.1微米的聚苯乙烯微球上。微球和样本如在传统双抗体夹心测定法中那样一起反应。然而,激光流式细胞术测量通过对较大微球散射的光进行选通并仅测量与这些颗粒相关的荧光,从而省略了分离和洗涤步骤。附着的0.1微米微球的荧光量取决于样本中毒素A的浓度。AFCF能检测到浓度为1 pg/ml的纯化毒素A,且在1至40 pg/ml范围内呈线性。通过比较198份疑似CAD患者粪便标本的结果,将AFCF与CTA及艰难梭菌培养法用于临床比较。相对于CTA,AFCF的敏感性为85.7%,特异性为95.8%;与培养测定法相比,敏感性为85.2%,特异性为98.3%。如果将产毒艰难梭菌的分离或患者的临床病程视为CAD的指征,则AFCF、CTA和培养测定法的敏感性分别为77.4%、67.7%和96.8%。AFCF的特异性为98.8%,而CTA和培养法的特异性均为100%。(摘要截短至250字)

相似文献

1
Development and clinical evaluation of an amplified flow cytometric fluoroimmunoassay for Clostridium difficile toxin A.艰难梭菌毒素A的扩增流式细胞荧光免疫分析方法的开发与临床评估
Cytometry. 1994 Jun 15;18(2):103-8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990180209.
2
Clinical usefulness of components of the Triage immunoassay, enzyme immunoassay for toxins A and B, and cytotoxin B tissue culture assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile diarrhea.用于艰难梭菌腹泻诊断的分诊免疫测定、毒素A和B酶免疫测定以及细胞毒素B组织培养测定各组分的临床实用性。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2003 Jan;119(1):45-9. doi: 10.1309/U8AT-L52Q-60XY-AVX6.
3
Performance of TechLab C. DIFF QUIK CHEK and TechLab C. DIFFICILE TOX A/B II for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples.TechLab艰难梭菌快速检测试剂盒和TechLab艰难梭菌毒素A/B II检测试剂盒在粪便样本中检测艰难梭菌的性能。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;59(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.04.018. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
4
Evaluation of four methods for detection of Clostridium difficile or C. difficile toxin: cytotoxin assay, culture, latex agglutination, and a new rapid immunoassay (C. difficile toxin A test).四种检测艰难梭菌或艰难梭菌毒素方法的评估:细胞毒素检测、培养、乳胶凝集试验以及一种新型快速免疫测定法(艰难梭菌毒素A检测)。
Z Gastroenterol. 1998 Feb;36(2):143-9.
5
Evaluation of biosite triage Clostridium difficile panel for rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples.用于粪便样本中艰难梭菌快速检测的生物位点分诊艰难梭菌检测板评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 May;39(5):1855-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1855-1858.2001.
6
Comparison of the premier toxin A and B assay and the TOX A/B II assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.用于艰难梭菌感染诊断的首要毒素A和B检测法与TOX A/B II检测法的比较
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008 Mar;15(3):575-8. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00282-07. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
7
The use of a commercially available enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A.使用市售酶免疫测定法检测艰难梭菌毒素A。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993 May;117(5):507-10.
8
Comparing ImmunoCard with two EIA assays for Clostridium difficile toxins.将免疫卡与两种检测艰难梭菌毒素的酶免疫分析方法进行比较。
Clin Lab Sci. 2009 Spring;22(2):81-5.
9
[Investigation of the presence of Clostridium difficile in antibiotic associated diarrhea patients by culture and toxin detection methods].[采用培养和毒素检测方法调查抗生素相关性腹泻患者中艰难梭菌的存在情况]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2007 Jan;41(1):29-37.
10
Evaluation of two enzyme immunoassays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in swine.评估两种酶免疫测定法用于检测猪体内艰难梭菌毒素A和毒素B的效果。
Vet Microbiol. 2008 Apr 1;128(1-2):204-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.09.022. Epub 2007 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications of flow cytometry to clinical microbiology.流式细胞术在临床微生物学中的应用。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000 Apr;13(2):167-95. doi: 10.1128/CMR.13.2.167.