• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品和器械监管:一个演变过程。

Regulation of drugs and devices: an evolution.

作者信息

Merrill R A

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Summer;13(3):47-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.47.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.47
PMID:7927161
Abstract

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) drug approval process has evolved from a system in which a drug could lawfully be marketed unless the FDA were able to prove that the manufacturer knew that the drug would not work for the conditions for which it was promoted to one in which drug-makers require advance approval from the agency for almost every important step in testing, production, and marketing. The more modern system for regulating medical devices is the product of amendments to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1976. In those amendments, Congress sought to create a framework for control of device technology that would also facilitate innovation. This paper suggests that, notwithstanding this aspiration, both external pressures and internal practices are inexorably bringing device regulation closer to the "drug model."

摘要

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的药品审批程序已从一种药品在未经FDA证明制造商知晓该药品对其推广适用病症无效时即可合法上市的体系,演变为制药商在测试、生产及营销的几乎每一个重要环节都需事先获得该机构批准的体系。更为现代的医疗设备监管体系是1976年对联邦《食品、药品和化妆品法案》进行修订的产物。在这些修订案中,国会力图创建一个既能控制设备技术又能促进创新的框架。本文表明,尽管有此愿景,但外部压力和内部做法都在无情地使设备监管更趋近于“药品模式”。

相似文献

1
Regulation of drugs and devices: an evolution.药品和器械监管:一个演变过程。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Summer;13(3):47-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.47.
2
Export of pharmaceuticals and medical devices under the federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act: FDA's striking change in interpretation post-Shelhigh.根据联邦《食品、药品和化妆品法案》进行的药品和医疗器械出口:谢尔希案后美国食品药品监督管理局在解释上的显著变化。
Food Drug Law J. 2009;64(1):149-69.
3
The history and contemporary challenges of the US Food and Drug Administration.美国食品药品监督管理局的历史与当代挑战
Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.006.
4
FDA's proposed regulations to expand access to investigational drugs for treatment use: the status quo in the guise of reform.美国食品药品监督管理局扩大治疗用研究性药物可及性的拟议法规:打着改革幌子的现状。
Food Drug Law J. 2009;64(1):183-223.
5
We really need to talk: adapting FDA processes to rapid change.我们确实需要进行探讨:使美国食品药品监督管理局的流程适应快速变化。
Food Drug Law J. 2013;68(4):357-99, i.
6
History of the Food and Drug Administration's regulation of acupuncture devices.
J Altern Complement Med. 1996 Spring;2(1):253-6. doi: 10.1089/acm.1996.2.253.
7
Unapproved drugs in the United States and the Food and Drug Administration.美国的未经批准药物和食品药品监督管理局。
Adv Ther. 2011 Oct;28(10):842-56. doi: 10.1007/s12325-011-0059-4. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
8
Gastroenterology-urology devices; effective date of requirement for premarket approval of the penile inflatable implant. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Final rule.胃肠病学-泌尿学器械;阴茎可膨胀植入物上市前批准要求的生效日期。美国卫生与公众服务部食品药品监督管理局。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2000 Apr 12;65(71):19650-8.
9
Commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Drug Amendments of 1962.纪念1962年《药品修正案》颁布50周年。
Food Drug Law J. 2013;68(4):449-65.
10
Medical devices; 30-day notices and 135-day PMA supplement review--FDA. Direct final rule; withdrawal.医疗器械;30天通知和135天的PMA补充审查——美国食品药品监督管理局。直接最终规则;撤回。
Fed Regist. 1998 Aug 11;63(154):42699.

引用本文的文献

1
Should Medical Devices Be Regulated as Rigorously as Drugs?医疗设备的监管应与药品一样严格吗?
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Sep-Oct;72(5):407-409. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
2
Improving the postmarket surveillance of total joint arthroplasty devices.改善全关节置换装置的上市后监测。
Open Rheumatol J. 2008;2:7-12. doi: 10.2174/1874312900802010007. Epub 2008 Feb 25.