Suppr超能文献

未选择的肝硬化静脉曲张出血患者行急诊门腔分流术与急诊药物治疗的前瞻性随机试验。

Prospective randomized trial of emergency portacaval shunt and emergency medical therapy in unselected cirrhotic patients with bleeding varices.

作者信息

Orloff M J, Bell R H, Orloff M S, Hardison W G, Greenburg A G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego 92103.

出版信息

Hepatology. 1994 Oct;20(4 Pt 1):863-72. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840200414.

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was conducted in unselected, consecutive patients with bleeding esophageal varices resulting from cirrhosis comparing (1) emergency portacaval shunt performed within 8 hr of initial contact (21 patients) with (2) emergency medical therapy (intravenous vasopressin and esophageal balloon tamponade) followed in 9 to 30 days by elective portacaval shunt in survivors (22 patients). All patients underwent the same diagnostic workup within 3 to 6 hr of initial contact, and received identical supportive therapy initially. All patients were followed up for at least 10 yr. The protocol contained no escape or cross-over provisions. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in the incidence of any of the clinical variables, results of laboratory tests or degree of portal hypertension. Child's risk classes in the shunt group were A-2 patients, B-8 patients and C-11 patients, whereas in the medical group they were A-10 patients, B-5 patients, and C-7 patients, a significant difference (p < 0.01) that might have favored emergency medical treatment. Bleeding was controlled initially and permanently by emergency shunt in every patient, but by medical therapy in only 45% (p < 0.001). Mean requirement for blood transfusion was 7.1 +/- 2.6 units in the shunt group and 21.4 +/- 2.6 units in the medical group (p < 0.001). Eighty-one percent of the patients in the shunt group were discharged alive compared with 45% in the medical group (p = 0.027). Five- and 10-yr observed survival rates were 67% and 57%, respectively, after emergency shunt compared with 18% and 18%, respectively, after the combination of emergency medical therapy and elective shunt (p < 0.01). These survival rates produced by emergency shunt performed within 8 hr of initial contact confirm the effectiveness of this procedure observed in our previous unrandomized studies.

摘要

对未经挑选的、连续的肝硬化所致食管静脉曲张出血患者进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,比较了:(1)在首次就诊8小时内进行的急诊门腔分流术(21例患者)与(2)急诊药物治疗(静脉注射血管加压素和食管气囊压迫),存活者在9至30天内接受择期门腔分流术(22例患者)。所有患者在首次就诊3至6小时内接受相同的诊断检查,并最初接受相同的支持治疗。所有患者均随访至少10年。该方案没有逃避或交叉规定。两个治疗组在任何临床变量的发生率、实验室检查结果或门静脉高压程度方面均无统计学显著差异。分流组中Child风险等级为A-2例患者、B-8例患者和C-11例患者,而药物治疗组中为A-10例患者、B-5例患者和C-7例患者,这一显著差异(p<0.01)可能有利于急诊药物治疗。每位患者通过急诊分流术最初且永久地控制了出血,但仅45%的患者通过药物治疗控制了出血(p<0.001)。分流组的平均输血量为7.1±2.6单位,药物治疗组为21.4±2.6单位(p<0.001)。分流组81%的患者存活出院,而药物治疗组为45%(p=0.027)。急诊分流术后5年和10年的观察生存率分别为67%和57%,而急诊药物治疗和择期分流术联合治疗后分别为18%和18%(p<0.01)。在首次就诊8小时内进行的急诊分流术所产生的这些生存率证实了我们之前非随机研究中观察到的该手术的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验