Jensen K, Gluud C
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Denmark.
Hepatology. 1994 Nov;20(5):1330-42.
Drawing on data from a previously published literature survey on the clinical and experimental epidemiology of the Mallory body, we discuss current theories on its development in a pro et contra manner. Conclusions have been largely left open to the interpretations of the reader because many are still speculative. The main results of this study characterize Mallory bodies as stereotypical histological byproducts to diverse hepatic injuries (mostly alcohol associated) of questionable pathogenic importance. The temporal characteristics of Mallory bodies cast doubt on their role in hepatic neoplasia both as a disease marker and a causative agent, and prognosis studies suggest that they may be considered preterminal markers in some nonalcoholic liver diseases but remain prognostically unimportant in most studies on alcoholic patients. By similar line of inquiry, no consistent relationships may be found with disease severity or duration in alcoholic liver diseases. The roles of vitamin A deficiency and protein-calorie malnutrition are circumstantial. Drugs known to have calcium-antagonist properties and the physiological characteristics of the stress-response protein ubiquitin support the concept of defective protein systems in Mallory body pathogenesis. Disproportionate hepatic copper accumulation seems both epidemiologically and topographically associated with Mallory bodies, but these connections are largely unsupported by exposure studies. Many arguments still downplay the importance of uncoordinated changes in hepatic oxygen delivery and consumption, but ischemia-reperfusion studies suggest a role of oxygen-derived free radicals in the liver injuries under scrutiny. Finally, the role of Mallory bodies in the control system of hepatocyte function is addressed, and indirect evidence lends credence to a cybernetic approach in future study designs. It is reasonable to assume that different elements of a multifactorial setting operate with varying intensity over time as this may account for some of the controversies that exist. In conclusion, the biological significance of Mallory bodies is still mystery. It is not known whether Mallory bodies represent an epiphenomenon or play a role themselves in the initiation and continuation of liver damage.
借鉴之前发表的关于马洛里小体临床与实验流行病学文献综述中的数据,我们以正反两方面的方式讨论了目前关于其形成的理论。由于许多结论仍属推测,因此很大程度上留给读者自行解读。本研究的主要结果表明,马洛里小体是多种肝损伤(大多与酒精相关)的典型组织学副产物,其致病重要性存疑。马洛里小体的时间特征使其作为疾病标志物和致病因子在肝脏肿瘤形成中的作用受到质疑,预后研究表明,在某些非酒精性肝病中它们可能被视为终末期前标志物,但在大多数酒精性肝病患者的研究中,它们在预后方面并不重要。通过类似的研究思路,在酒精性肝病中未发现与疾病严重程度或病程的一致关系。维生素A缺乏和蛋白质 - 热量营养不良的作用只是间接相关。已知具有钙拮抗剂特性的药物以及应激反应蛋白泛素的生理特性支持了马洛里小体发病机制中蛋白质系统缺陷的概念。肝脏铜的异常蓄积在流行病学和定位上似乎都与马洛里小体有关,但这些联系在暴露研究中大多未得到支持。许多观点仍淡化了肝脏氧输送和消耗不协调变化的重要性,但缺血再灌注研究表明氧衍生的自由基在所研究的肝损伤中起作用。最后,探讨了马洛里小体在肝细胞功能控制系统中的作用,间接证据为未来研究设计中的控制论方法提供了可信度。合理的假设是,多因素环境中的不同因素随时间以不同强度起作用,这可能解释了存在的一些争议。总之,马洛里小体的生物学意义仍是个谜。尚不清楚马洛里小体是一种附带现象还是在肝损伤的起始和持续过程中自身发挥作用。