Peterson C L
National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra.
Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(3):495-519. doi: 10.2190/3B3C-XJPP-47LA-XQUJ.
Occupational stress research encompasses a very large and diversified field, yet the areas sometimes remain relatively distinct. In this review of the literature the authors shows that there have been numerous studies and conceptualizations of the effects of negative work factors on stress, but very few have placed the experience of stress in a comprehensive framework. Psychological approaches are presented and critically appraised as having several drawbacks, while it is argued that sociological approaches are essential to explaining the context of occupational stress. Labor process studies are closest to providing a comprehensive framework for understanding the causes and consequences of stress at work. The author develops an approach for extending labor process analysis to incorporate the effects on stress of management's control over work at a number of different levels of analysis, not only point of production activities.
职业压力研究涵盖了一个非常庞大且多样化的领域,但这些领域有时仍相对独立。在这篇文献综述中,作者表明,关于负面工作因素对压力影响的研究和概念化有很多,但很少有研究将压力体验置于一个全面的框架中。文中介绍并批判性地评估了心理学方法,认为其存在若干缺陷,同时指出社会学方法对于解释职业压力的背景至关重要。劳动过程研究最接近于提供一个理解工作压力的成因和后果的全面框架。作者提出了一种扩展劳动过程分析的方法,以纳入管理层在多个不同分析层面(不仅是生产活动点)对工作控制对压力的影响。