Koh P, Thomas V J
King's College, University of London, England.
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jul;20(1):61-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010061.x.
This quasi-experimental study compared the degree of satisfaction with nursing care among patients receiving post-operative pain relief via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and those receiving traditional intramuscular injection (IMI) regimes. This study, which involved a total of 79 adult patients (mainly female) undergoing major abdominal surgery, was comprised of two main parts. First, the amount of time taken by nurses to carry out pain control procedures on 11 matched pairs of PCA and traditional patients was recorded. Second, all patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with the quality of nursing care they had received on their third post-operative day. The findings indicated that PCA did save time and this time saving could improve the nursing care quality of the whole ward, though not necessarily resulting in higher satisfaction amongst those patients who used PCA. Interestingly, younger and the more highly educated patients were found to be especially critical and be less satisfied with care. The implications for nursing practice and management are addressed, with special emphasis placed on the notion that time saved with PCA should be used to increase patient-nurse contact and should not be used to compensate for a reduction in nursing staff.
这项准实验研究比较了通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)接受术后疼痛缓解的患者与接受传统肌肉注射(IMI)方案的患者对护理的满意度。该研究共纳入79例接受大腹部手术的成年患者(主要为女性),主要由两个部分组成。首先,记录护士对11对匹配的PCA患者和传统患者进行疼痛控制程序所花费的时间。其次,所有患者被要求在术后第三天填写一份关于他们对所接受护理质量满意度的问卷。研究结果表明,PCA确实节省了时间,这种时间节省可以提高整个病房的护理质量,尽管不一定会使使用PCA的患者满意度更高。有趣的是,发现年轻和受教育程度较高的患者尤其挑剔,对护理的满意度较低。文中探讨了对护理实践和管理的启示,特别强调了PCA节省的时间应用于增加护患接触,而不应用于弥补护理人员的减少这一观点。