Shepard D S
Institute for Health Policy, Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254-9110.
J Infect Dis. 1994 Nov;170 Suppl 1:S56-62. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.supplement_1.s56.
An investment strategy in measles control should strike an appropriate balance among three areas: implementation of existing vaccination programs with existing technology, operations research to improve the use of existing technology, and vaccine development. As a benchmark, the existing Schwarz vaccine costs approximately $17 per DALY (disability-adjusted life year), already making it one of the most cost-effective health interventions in developing countries. National measles vaccination campaigns, such as Brazil's, are a promising extension of this technology. Operations research is indicated to study the organization of campaigns, supplying and delivering vitamin A to hospitalized children, and other issues. The development and application of an early one-dose measles vaccine would be particularly cost-effective ($5 per DALY), as it could avoid the costs to families and health institutions of the separate visit at 9 months now required for measles vaccination. All three areas present opportunities for cost-effective investments and deserve a place in an investment strategy.
运用现有技术实施现有疫苗接种计划、开展运筹学研究以改进现有技术的使用,以及疫苗研发。作为一个基准,现有的施瓦茨疫苗每获得一个伤残调整生命年(DALY)的成本约为17美元,这已使其成为发展中国家最具成本效益的卫生干预措施之一。像巴西开展的全国性麻疹疫苗接种运动就是这项技术很有前景的延伸。需要开展运筹学研究,以探讨运动的组织、为住院儿童供应和提供维生素A以及其他问题。研发和应用早期单剂量麻疹疫苗的成本效益将尤为显著(每DALY 5美元),因为它可以避免目前麻疹疫苗接种所需的9个月龄单独就诊给家庭和卫生机构带来的成本。这三个领域都存在具有成本效益的投资机会,理应在投资策略中占有一席之地。