Ross H E, Swinson R, Larkin E J, Doumani S
Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Oct;182(10):556-63. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199410000-00005.
This study compares DSM-III-R lifetime diagnoses assigned to a sample of substance abusers in treatment made by the Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule (C-DIS) with those made by clinicians on the basis of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) and patient chart information. A sample of 173 subjects were interviewed with the C-DIS and then by a clinician using the SCID. A second SCID was administered by a different clinician to 80 of the subjects 1 to 2 weeks later and consensus diagnoses were then made using all available information. With the exception of antisocial personality disorder and most psychoactive substance use disorders, the initial C-DIS showed poor diagnostic agreement with the initial SCID. As a potential screening instrument, the C-DIS did identify 30 of the 32 subjects with a consensus axis I (nondrug) disorder, but diagnosed twice as many positives as were confirmed by the consensus diagnoses. A negative C-DIS for comorbid disorders was confirmed in 9 out of 10 cases by clinicians.
本研究比较了通过计算机化诊断访谈程序(C-DIS)对接受治疗的药物滥用者样本进行的DSM-III-R终生诊断与临床医生基于DSM-III-R结构化临床访谈(SCID)和患者病历信息所做出的诊断。对173名受试者进行了C-DIS访谈,然后由一名临床医生使用SCID进行访谈。1至2周后,另一名临床医生对其中80名受试者进行了第二次SCID访谈,然后利用所有可用信息做出共识诊断。除反社会人格障碍和大多数精神活性物质使用障碍外,最初的C-DIS与最初的SCID诊断一致性较差。作为一种潜在的筛查工具,C-DIS确实识别出了32名有共识性轴I(非药物)障碍受试者中的30名,但诊断出的阳性病例数是共识诊断确认数的两倍。临床医生在10例中有9例确认了C-DIS对共病障碍的阴性诊断。