Koska J, Kelley E, Banner M J, Blanch P
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610-0254.
J Clin Monit. 1994 Jul;10(4):247-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02899510.
Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel fiberoptic system for airway pressure measurement at the carinal end of the endotracheal tube in an in vitro pediatric lung model.
A fiberoptic pressure measuring system was compared to the conventional method of measuring airway pressure with a pneumatic transducer using a test lung model. Pressure measurements were obtained using four endotracheal tubes of various internal diameters (ID) (3 to 6 mm) during simulated spontaneous and mechanical ventilation. Airway pressure was measured using both methods simultaneously and the results were compared by statistical analysis.
Airway pressure measured by the fiberoptic system was not significantly different from measurements obtained by the pneumatic transducer except when using the 3-mm and 4-mm ID endotracheal tubes during mechanical ventilation.
We conclude that the fiberoptic system provides accurate and precise measurement of airway pressure during spontaneous and mechanical ventilation. Additionally, the statistically significant differences obtained for 3- and 4-mm tubes are not large enough to be clinically significant. The fiberoptic system offers advantages over the pneumatic system for measuring the airway pressure. These advantages include decreased chance of false pressure measurement secondary to occlusion with water or mucous, less chance of kinking, and possibly, more rapid response to pressure changes due to the mechanical ventilator.
我们的目的是在体外小儿肺模型中评估一种用于测量气管插管隆突端气道压力的新型光纤系统的准确性。
使用测试肺模型,将光纤压力测量系统与使用气动换能器测量气道压力的传统方法进行比较。在模拟自主通气和机械通气期间,使用四种不同内径(3至6毫米)的气管插管进行压力测量。同时使用两种方法测量气道压力,并通过统计分析比较结果。
除了在机械通气期间使用3毫米和4毫米内径的气管插管时,光纤系统测量的气道压力与气动换能器获得的测量结果没有显著差异。
我们得出结论,光纤系统在自主通气和机械通气期间能提供准确且精确的气道压力测量。此外,3毫米和4毫米气管插管获得的统计学显著差异不够大,不足以具有临床意义。光纤系统在测量气道压力方面比气动系统具有优势。这些优势包括因水或黏液阻塞导致误测压力的可能性降低、扭结的可能性较小,并且可能由于机械通气机对压力变化的响应更快。