• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紫外线牙刷消毒装置在减少牙刷上细菌、酵母菌和病毒数量方面的有效性。

The effectiveness of a u-v toothbrush sanitizing device in reducing the number of bacteria, yeasts and viruses on toothbrushes.

作者信息

Glass R T, Jensen H G

机构信息

Department of Oral Pathology, University of Oklahoma College of Dentistry.

出版信息

J Okla Dent Assoc. 1994 Spring;84(4):24-8.

PMID:7931767
Abstract

Sixty-six sterile toothbrushes were exposed to one of the following microorganisms: Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Bacillis subtilis, Serratia marcescens and Baker's yeast. The Pollenex DS60 Daily Dental Sanitizer was found to be effective in substantially reducing the number of retained bacteria and yeasts as compared to contaminated toothbrushes not treated with such a device. Different toothbrush types had different response rates. Seventy-two sterile toothbrushes were exposed to Herpes Simplex Virus, Type I and seventy-two sterile toothbrushes were exposed to Parainfluenza Virus, Type III. The Pollenex DS60 Daily Dental Sanitizer consistently killed both viruses on all of the toothbrushes treated. Both viruses were consistently retained on non-treated toothbrushes for at least 24 hours.

摘要

66支无菌牙刷被暴露于以下微生物之一:金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、大肠杆菌、枯草芽孢杆菌、粘质沙雷氏菌和面包酵母。与未使用该设备处理的受污染牙刷相比,发现Pollenex DS60每日牙齿消毒器在大幅减少留存的细菌和酵母数量方面有效。不同类型的牙刷有不同的反应率。72支无菌牙刷暴露于I型单纯疱疹病毒,72支无菌牙刷暴露于III型副流感病毒。Pollenex DS60每日牙齿消毒器始终能杀死所有处理过的牙刷上的这两种病毒。这两种病毒在未处理的牙刷上始终留存至少24小时。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of a u-v toothbrush sanitizing device in reducing the number of bacteria, yeasts and viruses on toothbrushes.紫外线牙刷消毒装置在减少牙刷上细菌、酵母菌和病毒数量方面的有效性。
J Okla Dent Assoc. 1994 Spring;84(4):24-8.
2
Reduction in bacterial contamination of toothbrushes using the Violight ultraviolet light activated toothbrush sanitizer.使用Violight紫外线激活牙刷消毒器减少牙刷的细菌污染
Am J Dent. 2008 Oct;21(5):313-7.
3
Bacterial contamination and decontamination of toothbrushes after use.牙刷使用后的细菌污染与消毒
N Y State Dent J. 2007 Apr;73(3):20-2.
4
A quantitative approach to the effectiveness of ozone against microbiota organisms colonizing toothbrushes.一种关于臭氧对牙刷上定殖微生物群落有效性的定量研究方法。
J Dent. 2008 Aug;36(8):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 May 27.
5
The efficacy of two UV toothbrush sanitization devices. A pilot study.两种紫外线牙刷消毒装置的功效:一项初步研究。
N Y State Dent J. 2008 Jan;74(1):50-2.
6
A UVC device for intra-luminal disinfection of catheters: in vitro tests on soft polymer tubes contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans.一种用于导管腔内消毒的 UVC 装置:对软聚合物管内受绿脓假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和白色念珠菌污染的体外测试。
Photochem Photobiol. 2011 Sep-Oct;87(5):1123-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00962.x. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
7
Disinfection of toothbrushes contaminated with Streptococcus mutans.变形链球菌污染牙刷的消毒
Am J Dent. 2011 Jun;24(3):155-8.
8
The efficacy of chlorhexidine spray vs mouthwash in the microbial contamination of child toothbrushes.洗必泰喷雾与漱口水对儿童牙刷微生物污染的功效比较
J Dent Child (Chic). 2007 Sep-Dec;74(3):177-81.
9
Assessment of microbial contamination of toothbrush head: an in vitro study.牙刷头微生物污染的评估:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.79965.
10
Effect of ultraviolet on the survival of bacteria airborne in simulated Martian dust clouds.紫外线对模拟火星尘云中空气中细菌存活的影响。
Life Sci Space Res. 1970;8:53-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prospective Study on Assessment of Microbial Contamination of Toothbrushes and Methods of Their Decontamination.牙刷微生物污染评估及其去污方法的前瞻性研究
Cureus. 2022 Oct 10;14(10):e30155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30155. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Comparison of Bacterial Contamination and Antibacterial Efficacy in Bristles of Charcoal Toothbrushes versus Noncharcoal Toothbrushes: A Microbiological Study.炭质牙刷与非炭质牙刷刷毛的细菌污染及抗菌效果比较:一项微生物学研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):463-467. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_309_18.
3
Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of garlic, tea tree oil, cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine, and ultraviolet sanitizing device in the decontamination of toothbrush.
大蒜、茶树油、西吡氯铵、氯己定及紫外线消毒装置对牙刷去污抗菌效果的评估
Indian J Dent. 2014 Oct;5(4):183-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-962X.144718.
4
In vitro antifungal evaluation of seven different disinfectants on acrylic resins.七种不同消毒剂对丙烯酸树脂的体外抗真菌评估
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:519098. doi: 10.1155/2014/519098. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
5
Comparative evaluation of ultraviolet and microwave sanitization techniques for toothbrush decontamination.紫外线和微波消毒技术用于牙刷去污的比较评估
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2011 Jan;1(1):20-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.86383.
6
Effects of easy-to-perform procedures to reduce bacterial colonization with Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus on toothbrushes.易于实施的减少变形链球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌在牙刷上细菌定植的方法的效果。
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2013 Sep;3(3):204-10. doi: 10.1556/EuJMI.3.2013.3.9. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
7
Toothbrush contamination: a review of the literature.牙刷污染:文献综述
Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:420630. doi: 10.1155/2012/420630. Epub 2012 Jan 24.