Richards L, McAlister L
Department of Design, Housing, and Merchandising, Oklahoma State University, College of Human Environmental Sciences, Stillwater 74078.
J Psychol. 1994 Jul;128(4):419-24. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1994.9712747.
Previous studies in the United States have suggested that submissive women may be more vulnerable to criminal victimization because they present certain cues of vulnerability. Richards, Rollerson, and Phillips (1991) observed that submissive women exhibited more controlled body movements and more body-concealing clothing than did dominant women. Our purpose here was to determine whether such variability might be due to differences in body boundary definition. The results revealed no significant difference in the body boundary indicators of dominant and submissive subjects but did suggest that highly feminine women are more likely to have weak body boundaries than are more androgynous women.
美国此前的研究表明，顺从的女性可能更容易成为犯罪受害者，因为她们表现出某些易受伤害的迹象。理查兹、罗勒森和菲利普斯（1991年）观察到，与占主导地位的女性相比，顺从的女性身体动作更受控制，穿着更能遮盖身体的衣服。我们这里的目的是确定这种差异是否可能是由于身体边界定义的不同。结果显示，占主导地位和顺从的受试者在身体边界指标上没有显著差异，但确实表明，与更具中性气质的女性相比，极具女性气质的女性更有可能身体边界较弱。
