Lewis K P, Cooper J W, McKercher P L
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1976 Dec;33(12):1272-6.
Digoxin usage and toxicity were compared in a prospective group of patients who were monitored by a pharmacist and a retrospective group for which there was no pharmacist consultation. For the prospective group, the pharmacist monitored patients and estimated the steady-state digoxin levels by the use of a nomographic method. Level greater than 2.2 ng/ml and concurrent ECG or physical signs of digoxin toxicity were communicated to the physician. For the retrospective group, digoxin levels were calculated based on data from the patients' charts. The 49 patients in the two study groups were categorized according to four levels of digoxin toxicity (ranging from "no evidence" to "probable"). The only characteristic that was significantly different between the two groups was the calculated creatinine clearance (lower for the retrospective group). The maintenance dose of digoxin and the incidence of digoxin toxicity were significantly lower in the prospective group. It is concluded that pharmacist intervention may have had an effect in reducing digoxin dosage and toxicity.
对一组由药剂师监测的前瞻性患者和一组未接受药剂师咨询的回顾性患者的地高辛使用情况和毒性进行了比较。对于前瞻性组,药剂师监测患者,并使用列线图法估算地高辛稳态水平。高于2.2 ng/ml的水平以及地高辛毒性的并发心电图或体征会通报给医生。对于回顾性组,根据患者病历数据计算地高辛水平。两个研究组中的49名患者根据地高辛毒性的四个级别(从“无证据”到“可能”)进行分类。两组之间唯一显著不同的特征是计算得出的肌酐清除率(回顾性组较低)。前瞻性组地高辛维持剂量和地高辛毒性发生率显著较低。得出的结论是,药剂师干预可能对降低地高辛剂量和毒性有作用。