• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照顾重症儿童。

Caring for gravely ill children.

作者信息

Fleischman A R, Nolan K, Dubler N N, Epstein M F, Gerben M A, Jellinek M S, Litt I F, Miles M S, Oppenheimer S, Shaw A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine & Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1994 Oct;94(4 Pt 1):433-9.

PMID:7936849
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Much has been written about the care of the hopelessly ill adult, but there is little guidance for pediatric health care professionals in the management of children who are critically or terminally ill.

METHODS

Through a 3-day meeting in Tarrytown, NY, attended by a group of pediatricians and others directly involved in these issues, a principled approach was developed for the treatment of, and health care decision-making for, children who are gravely ill.

RESULTS

The group agreed that the needs and interests of the child must be the central focus of any treatment plan and that the child should be involved to as great extent possible, consistent with developmental maturity, in the decision-making process. Quality of future life should be viewed as being relevant in all decisions. Parents are believed to be the natural guardians of children and ought to have great latitude in making decisions for them. However, parental discretion is not absolute and professionals must maintain an independent obligation to protect the child's interests.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision-making should be collaborative among patient, parents, and professionals. When conflict arises, consultation and ethics committees may assist in resolution. When cure or restoration of function is no longer possible, or reasonable, promotion of comfort becomes the primary goal of management. Optimal use of pain medication and compassionate concern for the physical, psychological, and spiritual well-being of the child and family should be the primary focus of the professionals caring for the dying child.

摘要

背景

关于对无可救药的成年患者的护理已有诸多著述,但对于儿科医疗保健专业人员在治疗重症或绝症儿童方面,却几乎没有指导意见。

方法

通过在纽约塔里敦举行为期三天的会议,一群儿科医生及其他直接涉及这些问题的人员共同制定了一种针对重症儿童治疗及医疗保健决策的原则性方法。

结果

该小组一致认为,儿童的需求和利益必须是任何治疗计划的核心重点,并且在符合发育成熟度的情况下,儿童应尽可能参与决策过程。在所有决策中都应考虑未来生活质量。父母被视为儿童的自然监护人,在为其做出决策时应有很大的自由裁量权。然而,父母的决定权并非绝对,专业人员必须承担保护儿童利益的独立义务。

结论

决策应在患者、父母和专业人员之间协作进行。当出现冲突时,咨询和伦理委员会可协助解决。当治愈或恢复功能不再可行或不合理时,促进舒适成为管理的主要目标。最佳使用止痛药物以及对儿童及其家庭的身体、心理和精神福祉给予同情关怀,应成为照顾濒死儿童的专业人员的主要关注点。

相似文献

1
Caring for gravely ill children.照顾重症儿童。
Pediatrics. 1994 Oct;94(4 Pt 1):433-9.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
4
Parents' perspective on symptoms, quality of life, characteristics of death and end-of-life decisions for children dying from cancer.父母对患癌濒死儿童的症状、生活质量、死亡特征及临终决策的看法。
Klin Padiatr. 2008 May-Jun;220(3):166-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1065347.
5
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
6
Using vignettes to explore how parents approach end-of-life decision making for terminally ill infants.运用案例 vignettes 来探究父母如何为身患绝症的婴儿做出临终决策。 (注:这里原文中的“vignettes”直接保留未翻译,因为不太明确其在特定语境下准确的中文表述,一般可意译为“案例”等,具体需结合上下文确定准确译法)
Pediatr Nurs. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):333-40, 343.
7
Ethical controversies in pediatric critical care.儿科重症监护中的伦理争议。
New Horiz. 1997 Feb;5(1):72-84.
8
[Home care services and the role of "caregivers"].[居家护理服务与“护理人员”的角色]
Minerva Pediatr. 2001 Jun;53(3):161-9.
9
Guidelines for deciding care of critically ill or dying patients.危重症或临终患者护理决策指南。
Pediatrics. 1979 Jul;64(1):17-23.
10
Fathers and the well-child visit.父亲与健康儿童检查
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e637-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1612.

引用本文的文献

1
Recommendation by a law body to ban infant male circumcision has serious worldwide implications for pediatric practice and human rights.法律机构建议禁止男婴割礼,这对儿科实践和人权具有严重的全球影响。
BMC Pediatr. 2013 Sep 8;13:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-136.
2
An ethical analysis of end-of-life decision-making: can the pediatrician's approach to the never-capacitated and the internist's approach to the formerly-capacitated be mutually enhancing?临终决策的伦理分析:儿科医生对无行为能力者的处理方式与内科医生对曾有行为能力者的处理方式能否相互促进?
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1997;108:222-31; discussion 231-2.
3
Improving care of dying children.
改善对濒死儿童的护理。
West J Med. 1995 Sep;163(3):258-62.