• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症或临终患者护理决策指南。

Guidelines for deciding care of critically ill or dying patients.

作者信息

Duff R S

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1979 Jul;64(1):17-23.

PMID:450555
Abstract

Medical technology is usually beneficial in the care of sick or injured persons, sometimes dramatically so. However, since it is often intrusive, occasionally cruel, sometimes of little or no value, and almost always expensive, its use must be assessed critically, particularly in ICUs. Guidelines for doing this are proposed. To ensure the most caring approach to patient care and family support, the values and autonomy of patients and their families, one by one, are emphasized in all decision making and the roles of nurses and social workers as well as those of physicians are considered central. If these guidelines are used, many, perhaps most, of the ethical and legal issues and the problems of human relationships in ICUs will be resolved.

摘要

医疗技术通常有利于照顾生病或受伤的人,有时效果显著。然而,由于它常常具有侵入性,偶尔很残忍,有时价值不大或毫无价值,而且几乎总是成本高昂,因此必须对其使用进行严格评估,尤其是在重症监护病房。本文提出了进行评估的指导方针。为确保采取最体贴的方式照顾患者并给予家属支持,在所有决策中都要逐一强调患者及其家属的价值观和自主权,并且护士、社会工作者以及医生的角色都被视为核心。如果采用这些指导方针,重症监护病房中的许多(或许是大多数)伦理和法律问题以及人际关系问题都将得到解决。

相似文献

1
Guidelines for deciding care of critically ill or dying patients.危重症或临终患者护理决策指南。
Pediatrics. 1979 Jul;64(1):17-23.
2
Caring for gravely ill children.照顾重症儿童。
Pediatrics. 1994 Oct;94(4 Pt 1):433-9.
3
Where do we go from here? A palliative care perspective.从这里我们将何去何从?姑息治疗视角。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11 Suppl):S416-20. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000237345.62823.82.
4
[Withholding and withdrawing therapy--how does the physician make a decision?].[停止和撤销治疗——医生如何做出决策?]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2009 May;44(5):380-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224785. Epub 2009 May 13.
5
End-of-life issues in intensive care units: a national random survey of nurses' knowledge and beliefs.重症监护病房中的临终问题:一项关于护士知识与信念的全国随机调查。
Am J Crit Care. 2001 Jul;10(4):216-29.
6
Shared decision making in critical care: a clinical reality and an ethical necessity.重症监护中的共同决策:临床现实与伦理必然要求。
Am J Crit Care. 1996 Nov;5(6):391-6.
7
The role of social work in the ICU: reducing family distress and facilitating end-of-life decision-making.社会工作在重症监护病房中的作用:减轻家属痛苦并促进临终决策。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2006;2(2):3-23. doi: 10.1300/J457v02n02_02.
8
Decision-making by default: experiences of physicians and nurses with dying patients in intensive care.默认情况下的决策:重症监护中医生和护士对临终患者的经历
Hum Health Care Int. 1996 Nov;12(4):168-72.
9
The dying thoracic patient.濒死的胸科患者。
Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1998 Aug;8(3):723-39.
10
Collaborative interdisciplinary bioethical decision making in intensive care units.重症监护病房中的跨学科生物伦理协作决策
Nurs Outlook. 1993 May-Jun;41(3):108-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Life and Medical Ethics in Pediatric Neurosurgery.小儿神经外科中的生命与医学伦理
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017 Feb 15;57(2):101-105. doi: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0122. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
2
Mandatory ethics consultation policy.强制性伦理咨询政策。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Jul;84(7):581-5. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60746-5.
3
"No resuscitation" orders.“不要复苏”医嘱。
Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Apr 1;126(7):768-9.