Suppr超能文献

抗焦虑药SC 48,274用于广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的评估。

An evaluation of the anxiolytic SC 48,274 in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).

作者信息

Cutler N R, Sramek J J, Macpherson A E, Doss M G, Benes C O, Howard S F

机构信息

California Clinical Trials, Beverly Hills.

出版信息

Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;18(4):685-94. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(94)90076-0.

Abstract
  1. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of two dosages of SC 48,274 (1mg and 25mg) as compared to placebo in subjects with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). 2. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study which was part of one of three large multicenter trials which evaluated a total of 5 doses of SC 48,274 (.25, 1, 5, 25, and 100mg bid). Following a 7-day placebo baseline period, patients entered 4 weeks of double-blind treatment and a 7-day placebo follow-up period. 3. Efficacy was assessed weekly throughout the study with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and at treatment endpoint with the Covi Anxiety Scale, Raskin Depression Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). A diagnosis of GAD according to DSM-III-R criteria (with the exception that a GAD minimum duration of 3 months was allowed), a HAM-A score > or = 20 (anxious mood and tension items > or = 2), HAM-D less than HAM-A, Covi Anxiety Score > or = 8, Raskin Depression Scale less than the Covi Anxiety, and age of 18 to 65 years were necessary for inclusion in the study. 4. Patients received one of two dosages of SC 48,274, either 1mg (n = 28), 25mg (n = 9), or placebo (n = 28) bid, during the 4-week randomized portion of the trial. 5. Mean changes from baseline in HAM-A scores for the 1mg, 25mg, and placebo groups after 4 weeks treatment were -5.1, -4.2, and -1.9, respectively. Changes were significant for the 1mg group vs. placebo (F = 8.93, p = 0.004), but not for the 25mg group (F = 2.26, p = 0.138). 6. CGI severity of illness scores were also significant for the 1mg group versus placebo at the end of treatment (X2 = 3.8, p = 0.05), but not for the 25mg group (X2 = 0.90, p = 0.343). Neither group showed significant CGI improvement scores by end of treatment. 7. The most frequent adverse events associated with the study drug (n = 37) were headache (n = 7), nausea (n = 3), palpitations (n = 4) and chest pains (n = 2). There was, however, no apparent pattern of adverse events distinguishing SC 48,274 from placebo.
摘要
  1. 本研究评估了两种剂量(1毫克和25毫克)的SC 48,274与安慰剂相比,对广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)患者的安全性和有效性。2. 这是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,是三项大型多中心试验之一的一部分,该试验总共评估了5种剂量的SC 48,274(每日两次,剂量分别为0.25、1、5、25和100毫克)。在为期7天的安慰剂基线期后,患者进入为期4周的双盲治疗期和为期7天的安慰剂随访期。3. 在整个研究过程中,每周使用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM - A)和临床总体印象(CGI)评估疗效,并在治疗终点使用科维焦虑量表、拉斯金抑郁量表和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM - D)进行评估。根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM - III - R)标准诊断为GAD(允许GAD最短病程为3个月),HAM - A评分≥20(焦虑情绪和紧张项目≥2),HAM - D低于HAM - A,科维焦虑评分≥8,拉斯金抑郁量表低于科维焦虑量表,年龄在18至65岁之间,是纳入本研究的必要条件。4. 在试验的4周随机分组阶段,患者接受两种剂量的SC 48,274之一,即1毫克(n = 28)、25毫克(n = 9)或安慰剂(n = 28),每日两次。5. 治疗4周后,1毫克、25毫克和安慰剂组的HAM - A评分相对于基线的平均变化分别为-5.1、-4.2和-1.9。1毫克组与安慰剂组相比变化显著(F = 8.93,p = 0.004),但25毫克组不显著(F = 2.26,p = 0.138)。6. 在治疗结束时,1毫克组与安慰剂组相比,CGI疾病严重程度评分也显著(X2 = 3.8,p = 0.05),但25毫克组不显著(X2 = 0.90,p = 0.343)。到治疗结束时,两组的CGI改善评分均无显著差异。7. 与研究药物相关的最常见不良事件(n = 37)为头痛(n = 7)、恶心(n = 3)、心悸(n = 4)和胸痛(n = 2)。然而,没有明显的不良事件模式能够区分SC 48,274与安慰剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验