Michetti G, Mosconi G, Zanelli R, Migliori M, Gaffuri G, Villa R, Michetti L
Department of Pneumology, Ospedali Riuniti of Bergamo, Largo Barozzi, Italy.
Sci Total Environ. 1994 Jun 30;150(1-3):173-8. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(94)90147-3.
The bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of two groups of hard metal workers (11 subjects) were examined and compared with BALs of 14 unexposed individuals as controls. The first group of workers included five asymptomatic subjects (2 females and 3 males) with normal lung function tests and chest X-rays. All the workers had been exposed daily to hard metal dust for 5 years before fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The second group of workers included six individuals (1 female and 5 males) with cobalt lung disease at biopsy. The BAL's cytology at the deep lung level is in agreement with a possible immunologic pathogenesis of the lung disease, similar to hypersensitivity pneumonitis (lymphocytosis with helper-suppressor ratio reduction). In order to identify diagnostic key-parameters, the data presented here are compared with data reported in literature for workers with a history of hard metal or cobalt (alone) exposure. Although the BAL can be useful, for a better definition of the reaction at the deep lung level, it seems insufficient per se for the diagnosis of hard metal lung disease.
对两组硬质合金工人(11名受试者)进行了支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)检查,并与14名未接触者的BAL进行比较作为对照。第一组工人包括5名无症状受试者(2名女性和3名男性),其肺功能测试和胸部X光检查均正常。所有工人在接受纤维支气管镜检查前,每天接触硬质合金粉尘5年。第二组工人包括6名活检确诊为钴肺病的个体(1名女性和5名男性)。深部肺水平的BAL细胞学结果与该肺病可能的免疫发病机制一致,类似于过敏性肺炎(淋巴细胞增多伴辅助抑制细胞比例降低)。为了确定诊断关键参数,将此处呈现的数据与文献中报道的有硬质合金或(单独)钴接触史工人的数据进行比较。尽管BAL可能有用,但为了更好地界定深部肺水平的反应,其本身似乎不足以用于诊断硬质合金肺病。