Fruchter J
Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, New York.
Am J Law Med. 1993;19(4):453-95.
The recent and continual call for tort reform has many scholars proposing alternatives to current U.S. medical malpractice law. Most commentators limit their discussions to variations of the two Anglo Saxon theories of liability--negligence and strict liability. Little has been written examining the legal treatment of medical malpractice in other cultures. This article compares and contrasts Jewish and American medical malpractice law, examining both the contemporary and ancient sources of the law.
近期持续不断的侵权法改革呼声促使众多学者提出替代美国现行医疗事故法的方案。大多数评论家将讨论局限于两种盎格鲁 - 撒克逊责任理论的变体——过失责任和严格责任。关于其他文化中医疗事故法律处理方式的著述甚少。本文比较并对比了犹太法和美国的医疗事故法，审视了该法律的当代及古代渊源。
