Suppr超能文献

受审医生:美国与犹太法律体系对医疗事故处理方式的比较

Doctors on trial: a comparison of American and Jewish legal approaches to medical malpractice.

作者信息

Fruchter J

机构信息

Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, New York.

出版信息

Am J Law Med. 1993;19(4):453-95.

PMID:7942865
Abstract

The recent and continual call for tort reform has many scholars proposing alternatives to current U.S. medical malpractice law. Most commentators limit their discussions to variations of the two Anglo Saxon theories of liability--negligence and strict liability. Little has been written examining the legal treatment of medical malpractice in other cultures. This article compares and contrasts Jewish and American medical malpractice law, examining both the contemporary and ancient sources of the law.

摘要

近期持续不断的侵权法改革呼声促使众多学者提出替代美国现行医疗事故法的方案。大多数评论家将讨论局限于两种盎格鲁 - 撒克逊责任理论的变体——过失责任和严格责任。关于其他文化中医疗事故法律处理方式的著述甚少。本文比较并对比了犹太法和美国的医疗事故法,审视了该法律的当代及古代渊源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验