Kienzle H F
Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Krankenhaus Holweide.
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Nov;90(7):592-6.
The standard for the assessment of the medical expert opinion is defined by the high demands expected from the judgement of a high court: Objectiveness, solid knowledge, self-criticism, in contestability in diction and firmness in the argumentation. From the legal point of view, the knowledge of the medical expert witness has to clearly go beyond the knowledge of his profession. The obligation for objectiveness is the basis of expert witness' activity. From the medical point of view, the physician has to take into account during the preparation of his expert assessment that structural deficiency of the personnel and surgical equipment of a department for surgery frequently plays a role due to the development of surgery to high tech medicine and the hospital physician cannot affect this. It is necessary for a physician as an expert witness to have basic knowledge about the evidence law and the medical liability process. On the other hand, judges and lawyers should basically know the medical way of thinking.
客观性、扎实的知识、自我批评、措辞无可争议以及论证坚定。从法律角度来看,医学专家证人的知识必须明显超越其专业知识。客观性义务是专家证人活动的基础。从医学角度来看,医生在准备其专家评估时必须考虑到,由于外科手术向高科技医学的发展,外科科室人员和手术设备的结构性缺陷经常起作用,而医院医生对此无法施加影响。作为专家证人的医生有必要具备关于证据法和医疗责任程序的基本知识。另一方面,法官和律师基本上应该了解医学思维方式。