Itano S, Hirai K, Kajiwara M, Ijuin H, Yoshiyama Y, Yoshida T, Sakata K, Ono N, Noguchi H, Sakai T
Second Dept. of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1994 Sep;21(13):2136-9.
The subjects were 41 cases with implantable reservoir systems for unresectable hepatic tumors. We evaluated the difference in drug distribution between intra-hepatic arterial continuous infusion and rapid infusion using hepatic perfusion scintigraphy by 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin via reservoirs. The 41 cases were divided into 2 groups (A and B) according to the imaging of the perfusion scintigraphy. There were 17 cases in group A with equal distribution and 24 cases in group B with a different distribution between the continuous infusion and the rapid infusion. The 24 cases in group B were subdivided into groups according to the distribution of 99mTc-MAA in and around liver. In some cases the distribution pattern after rapid infusion improved more than with continuous infusion. These results suggested that the infusion method must be selected for every case.
研究对象为41例植入可植入式储液器系统用于不可切除性肝肿瘤的患者。我们通过储液器,使用99mTc-大聚合人血清白蛋白肝灌注闪烁显像评估肝动脉持续输注和快速输注之间药物分布的差异。根据灌注闪烁显像的影像,将41例患者分为两组(A组和B组)。A组有17例分布均匀,B组有24例持续输注和快速输注之间分布不同。根据99mTc-MAA在肝脏内及周围的分布,将B组的24例再细分。在某些情况下,快速输注后的分布模式比持续输注改善得更多。这些结果表明,必须针对每个病例选择输注方法。