Borms S F, Engelen S L, Himpe D G, Suy M R, Theunissen W J
Department of Anesthesiology, Middelheim General Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
J Clin Anesth. 1994 Jul-Aug;6(4):303-7. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(94)90077-9.
To compare the ability of forced-air warming and reflective insulation to maintain intraoperative normothermia.
Prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Operating rooms of a general hospital.
20 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty.
Patients were randomly assigned to be warmed intraoperatively using forced-air or reflective insulation. Inspired gases were conditioned using a heat-and-moisture exchanger in both groups, and infused intravenous fluids were warmed to 37 degrees C.
Distal esophageal (core) temperatures decreased approximately 0.5 degrees C in both groups during the first 45 minutes of anesthesia. Subsequently, core temperatures increased slightly in the patients given forced-air warming. In contrast, core temperatures continued to decrease in patients covered with reflective insulation. After 135 minutes of anesthesia, core temperatures were 36.4 +/- 0.6 degrees C (mean +/- SD) in the forced-air group but only 35.4 +/- 0.6 degrees C in the insulated group (p < 0.01, unpaired t-test). These data indicate that forced-air warming is superior to reflective insulation.
Reflective insulation was unable to maintain intraoperative normothermia during total hip arthroplasty. Active warming, such as that provided by forced air, was required to prevent hypothermia.
比较强制空气加温与反射性保温维持术中正常体温的能力。
前瞻性随机临床试验。
一家综合医院的手术室。
20例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级、接受择期全髋关节置换术的患者。
患者被随机分配在术中使用强制空气加温或反射性保温。两组均使用热湿交换器调节吸入气体,静脉输注的液体加温至37摄氏度。
麻醉的前45分钟内,两组患者的食管远端(核心)温度均下降约0.5摄氏度。随后,接受强制空气加温的患者核心温度略有上升。相比之下,使用反射性保温的患者核心温度持续下降。麻醉135分钟后,强制空气组的核心温度为36.4±0.6摄氏度(均值±标准差),而保温组仅为35.4±0.6摄氏度(p<0.01,非配对t检验)。这些数据表明强制空气加温优于反射性保温。
在全髋关节置换术中,反射性保温无法维持术中正常体温。需要采用主动加温,如强制空气加温,以预防体温过低。