Maier W, Franke P, Kopp B, Hardt J, Hain C, Rist F
Department of Psychiatry, University of Mainz, Germany.
Schizophr Res. 1994 Aug;13(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/0920-9964(94)90058-2.
Deviant response patterns in experimental reaction time paradigms in schizophrenic probands are well documented. Although simple reaction times are strongly influenced by the current psychopathological status of the proband (e.g. florid psychotic patients versus remitted patients) these influences are less clear for measures obtained from more complex reaction time paradigms. These include the crossover paradigm (reaction time to stimuli presented after constant preparatory intervals in comparison to reaction time to stimuli presented after irregular preparatory intervals) and the modality shift paradigm (reaction time to a stimulus (light or tone) when the modality of the stimulus on the preceding trial was the same compared to when it was different). It is not clear if these peculiarities of response patterns occur as a consequence of the disease or if they represent vulnerability markers for schizophrenia. Both crossover reaction time and modality shift reaction time paradigms were applied to 56 drug free schizophrenics, 45 healthy siblings of these patients and 68 healthy controls. The results indicate that retarded reaction times and the occurrence of the crossover effect as well as of the modality shift effect distinguish schizophrenics and controls. Healthy siblings of schizophrenics differed from healthy controls with regard to the crossover effect but not with regard to the modality shift effect. Therefore only the crossover effect represents a vulnerability marker for schizophrenia. Correlations between the modality shift and the crossover effect revealed strong correlations in the schizophrenic group only.
精神分裂症先证者在实验反应时范式中的异常反应模式已有充分记录。虽然简单反应时受先证者当前精神病理状态的强烈影响(例如,急性精神病患者与缓解期患者),但对于从更复杂反应时范式中获得的测量结果,这些影响并不那么明显。这些范式包括交叉范式(与不规则准备间隔后呈现的刺激的反应时相比,恒定准备间隔后呈现的刺激的反应时)和模态转换范式(与前一次试验刺激模态不同时相比,前一次试验刺激模态相同时对刺激(光或音)的反应时)。目前尚不清楚这些反应模式的特殊性是疾病的结果还是精神分裂症的易感性标志物。交叉反应时和模态转换反应时范式都应用于56名未服药的精神分裂症患者、这些患者的45名健康同胞以及68名健康对照。结果表明,反应时延迟以及交叉效应和模态转换效应的出现可区分精神分裂症患者和对照组。精神分裂症患者的健康同胞在交叉效应方面与健康对照不同,但在模态转换效应方面没有差异。因此,只有交叉效应代表精神分裂症的易感性标志物。模态转换效应和交叉效应之间的相关性仅在精神分裂症组中显示出强相关性。