• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Subarachnoid labor analgesia. Fentanyl and morphine versus sufentanil and morphine.

作者信息

Arkoosh V A, Sharkey S J, Norris M C, Isaacson W, Honet J E, Leighton B L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Reg Anesth. 1994 Jul-Aug;19(4):243-6.

PMID:7947424
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the duration of pain relief and incidence of side effects using two subarachnoid administered drug combinations for labor analgesia: fentanyl 25 micrograms with morphine 0.25 mg or sufentanil 10 micrograms with morphine 0.25 mg.

METHODS

Thirty healthy term primagravid patients with cervical dilation < or = 5 cm consented to participate in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients received the assigned drug combination subarachnoid with simultaneous epidural catheter placement using a double needle technique. The authors recorded blood pressure and patient's rated pain, nausea, and pruritus using 10-cm visual analog scales at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and every 30 minutes until the patient requested additional analgesia.

RESULTS

The onset of analgesia was rapid in both groups. The mean duration of analgesia was similar; 114 +/- 55 minutes in the fentanyl and morphine group and 134 +/- 79 minutes in the sufentanil and morphine group. The sufentanil and morphine group experienced more severe pruritus (P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

Both fentanyl and morphine and sufentanil and morphine provide adequate labor analgesia for about 2 hours. Patients who receive sufentanil experience more severe pruritus.

摘要

相似文献

1
Subarachnoid labor analgesia. Fentanyl and morphine versus sufentanil and morphine.
Reg Anesth. 1994 Jul-Aug;19(4):243-6.
2
Subarachnoid morphine and fentanyl for labor analgesia. Efficacy and adverse effects.
Reg Anesth. 1994 Jan-Feb;19(1):2-8.
3
Subarachnoid fentanyl augments lidocaine spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.蛛网膜下腔注射芬太尼增强利多卡因用于剖宫产的脊髓麻醉效果。
Reg Anesth. 1995 Sep-Oct;20(5):389-94.
4
Analgesic efficacy and side effects of subarachnoid sufentanil-bupivacaine administered to women in advanced labor.蛛网膜下腔注射舒芬太尼-布比卡因对晚期分娩妇女的镇痛效果及副作用
Reg Anesth. 1996 Sep-Oct;21(5):424-9.
5
Comparison of sufentanil, bupivacaine, and their combination for epidural analgesia in obstetrics.舒芬太尼、布比卡因及其联合用药用于产科硬膜外镇痛的比较。
Reg Anesth. 1992 May-Jun;17(3):131-8.
6
Intravenous ketorolac and subarachnoid opioid analgesia in the management of acute postoperative pain.静脉注射酮咯酸与蛛网膜下腔阿片类药物镇痛在急性术后疼痛管理中的应用
Reg Anesth. 1995 Sep-Oct;20(5):395-401.
7
Postoperative analgesia for major abdominal surgery with continuous thoracic epidural infusion of bupivacaine with sufentanil, versus bupivacaine with morphine. A randomized double blind study.布比卡因联合舒芬太尼持续胸段硬膜外输注与布比卡因联合吗啡用于腹部大手术术后镇痛的随机双盲研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1992;43(2):131-7.
8
Spinal analgesia during labor with low-dose bupivacaine, sufentanil, and epinephrine. A comparison with epidural analgesia.分娩期间使用低剂量布比卡因、舒芬太尼和肾上腺素进行脊髓镇痛。与硬膜外镇痛的比较。
Reg Anesth. 1996 May-Jun;21(3):191-6.
9
Epidural analgesia during and after cesarean delivery. Comparison of five opioids.剖宫产术中及术后的硬膜外镇痛。五种阿片类药物的比较。
Reg Anesth. 1991 Mar-Apr;16(2):79-83.
10
Comparison of sufentanil versus fentanyl with 0.125% bupivacaine for continuous labor epidural anesthesia.舒芬太尼与芬太尼联合0.125%布比卡因用于分娩持续硬膜外麻醉的比较。
CRNA. 1995 Feb;6(1):26-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Levobupivacaine with Tramadol or Morphine Addition on Postoperative Analgesia following Major Abdominal Surgery.腹部大手术后硬膜外左旋布比卡因联合曲马多或吗啡对术后镇痛效果的比较
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019 Aug;47(4):287-294. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.00936. Epub 2019 Feb 21.