Suppr超能文献

哪种宫颈采样器?四种方法的比较。

Which cervical sampler? A comparison of four methods.

作者信息

Metcalf K S, Sutton J, Moloney M D, Brown L A, Peel K R, Baines A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds General Infirmary, UK.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 1994 Aug;5(4):219-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1994.tb00423.x.

Abstract

Four cytology sampling methods were compared in 1063 patients referred for colposcopy with a recent abnormal smear. A dyskaryotic smear of any grade was considered a positive result, though comparisons were limited to cases with a subsequent biopsy confirming CINII or III. There were no differences between the abilities of any of the four methods to detect higher grades of CIN (chi (2)3 = 4.603, P > 0.20). The presence or absence of endocervical cells in a smear was not significantly associated with any variation in success rate (chi (2)1 = 0.959, P > 0.30). The joint analysis of the four methods and the presence/absence of endocervical cells also showed no significant effects (chi (2)7 = 12.768, 0.1 > P > 0.05). In the latter analysis the trend towards a conventional level of significance was accounted for by the Aylesbury spatula giving a relatively high success rate when endocervical cells were present. The suggestion of advantage for the Aylesbury spatula merits further investigation.

摘要

对1063例因近期涂片异常而转诊接受阴道镜检查的患者,比较了四种细胞学取样方法。任何级别的核异质涂片均被视为阳性结果,不过比较仅限于后续活检证实为CINII或III的病例。四种方法中任何一种检测高级别CIN的能力之间均无差异(χ(2)3 = 4.603,P>0.20)。涂片中宫颈管细胞的有无与成功率的任何变化均无显著相关性(χ(2)1 = 0.959,P>0.30)。四种方法与宫颈管细胞有无的联合分析也未显示出显著影响(χ(2)7 = 12.768,0.1>P>0.05)。在后者的分析中,当存在宫颈管细胞时,Aylesbury刮匙成功率相对较高,这一情况导致了接近传统显著性水平的趋势。Aylesbury刮匙具有优势这一迹象值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验