Suppr超能文献

专家与新手问题解决策略的人工神经网络比较

Artificial neural network comparison of expert and novice problem-solving strategies.

作者信息

Stevens R H, Lopo A C

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UCLA School of Medicine 90024-1847.

出版信息

Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:64-8.

Abstract

The successful strategies of second-year medical students were electronically captured from computer-based simulations in immunology and infectious disease and were used to train artificial neural networks for the rapid classification of subsequent students' and experts' strategies on these problems. Such networks could categorize problem solutions of other students as successful or nonsuccessful > 85% of the time. These neural networks, however, performed poorly (as low as 13%) when classifying experienced immunologists' or internists' successful performances, suggesting an ability to distinguish between novice and expert strategies. The neural networks also identified a group of students who framed the infectious disease problems correctly, but had difficulty discriminating between differential diagnoses.

摘要

从基于计算机的免疫学和传染病模拟中以电子方式获取了二年级医学生的成功策略,并将其用于训练人工神经网络,以便对后续学生和专家在这些问题上的策略进行快速分类。此类网络能够在超过85%的时间里将其他学生的问题解决方案归类为成功或不成功。然而,这些神经网络在对经验丰富的免疫学家或内科医生的成功表现进行分类时表现不佳(低至13%),这表明它们有区分新手和专家策略的能力。神经网络还识别出了一组能正确构建传染病问题,但在鉴别诊断方面存在困难的学生。

相似文献

8
Evaluating preclinical medical students by using computer-based problem-solving examinations.
Acad Med. 1989 Nov;64(11):685-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198911000-00018.
9
A randomized comparison of alternative formats for clinical simulations.
Med Decis Making. 1991 Oct-Dec;11(4):265-72. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9101100404.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验