Suppr超能文献

吗氯贝胺与氯米帕明治疗内源性抑郁症的双盲随机临床试验

Moclobemide versus clomipramine in endogenous depression. A double-blind randomised clinical trial.

作者信息

Guelfi J D, Payan C, Fermanian J, Pedarriosse A M, Manfredi R

机构信息

Ste-Anne Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1992 Apr;160:519-24. doi: 10.1192/bjp.160.4.519.

Abstract

The effects of moclobemide (300-600 mg/day), a reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor - A (MAOI-A), were compared in a double-blind, multi-centre trial with those of clomipramine (100-200 mg/day) on 129 in-patients suffering from endogenous depression (according to ICD-9 and the Newcastle Scale). No significant differences in efficacy were seen between the two treatment groups. In the moclobemide group the mean scores on the MADRS were 36.4 on day 0 and 13.2 on day 42 (end-point analysis); scores were 37.4 and 10.9 respectively in the clomipramine group. An earlier onset of antidepressant activity was noted for moclobemide. Tolerability was significantly better for moclobemide, as shown by the Clinical Global Impression of Tolerance (CGIT). Anticholinergic effects, weight gain and orthostatic hypotension were more frequent in the clomipramine group. No biological treatment-related changes were observed.

摘要

在一项双盲、多中心试验中,对129名患有内源性抑郁症(根据国际疾病分类第9版和纽卡斯尔量表)的住院患者,比较了可逆性单胺氧化酶抑制剂A(MAOI - A)吗氯贝胺(300 - 600毫克/天)与氯米帕明(100 - 200毫克/天)的疗效。两个治疗组之间在疗效上未见显著差异。在吗氯贝胺组,蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)的平均得分在第0天为36.4,在第42天(终点分析)为13.2;氯米帕明组的得分分别为37.4和10.9。观察到吗氯贝胺的抗抑郁活性起效更早。根据临床总体耐受性印象(CGIT)显示,吗氯贝胺的耐受性明显更好。氯米帕明组中抗胆碱能效应、体重增加和体位性低血压更为常见。未观察到与生物治疗相关的变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验