Guelfi J D, Payan C, Fermanian J, Pedarriosse A M, Manfredi R
Ste-Anne Hospital, Paris, France.
Br J Psychiatry. 1992 Apr;160:519-24. doi: 10.1192/bjp.160.4.519.
The effects of moclobemide (300-600 mg/day), a reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor - A (MAOI-A), were compared in a double-blind, multi-centre trial with those of clomipramine (100-200 mg/day) on 129 in-patients suffering from endogenous depression (according to ICD-9 and the Newcastle Scale). No significant differences in efficacy were seen between the two treatment groups. In the moclobemide group the mean scores on the MADRS were 36.4 on day 0 and 13.2 on day 42 (end-point analysis); scores were 37.4 and 10.9 respectively in the clomipramine group. An earlier onset of antidepressant activity was noted for moclobemide. Tolerability was significantly better for moclobemide, as shown by the Clinical Global Impression of Tolerance (CGIT). Anticholinergic effects, weight gain and orthostatic hypotension were more frequent in the clomipramine group. No biological treatment-related changes were observed.
在一项双盲、多中心试验中,对129名患有内源性抑郁症(根据国际疾病分类第9版和纽卡斯尔量表)的住院患者,比较了可逆性单胺氧化酶抑制剂A(MAOI - A)吗氯贝胺(300 - 600毫克/天)与氯米帕明(100 - 200毫克/天)的疗效。两个治疗组之间在疗效上未见显著差异。在吗氯贝胺组,蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)的平均得分在第0天为36.4,在第42天(终点分析)为13.2;氯米帕明组的得分分别为37.4和10.9。观察到吗氯贝胺的抗抑郁活性起效更早。根据临床总体耐受性印象(CGIT)显示,吗氯贝胺的耐受性明显更好。氯米帕明组中抗胆碱能效应、体重增加和体位性低血压更为常见。未观察到与生物治疗相关的变化。