Barclay M L, Begg E J, Hickling K G
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994 Jul;27(1):32-48. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199427010-00004.
Aminoglycosides are important antibacterial agents for the treatment of serious infection. Evidence suggests that high peak plasma concentrations must be achieved early in the course of treatment if these agents are to be effective, but prolonged high concentrations may cause ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Peak plasma concentrations of 6 to 10 mg/L and trough concentrations of less than 2 mg/L for gentamicin and tobramycin have been traditional goals of therapy. Extensive recent evidence from in vitro, animal and human studies suggests that these target concentrations need revision. Aminoglycosides display concentration-dependent bacterial killing, have a long postantibiotic effect, and induce adaptive resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. All of these factors support the use of larger doses of aminoglycosides that are given less frequently than conventional therapy. Studies in vitro support this approach, showing greater activity when aminoglycosides are given less frequently. Animal studies comparing different dosage intervals have shown varying results, with only a slight bias favouring the longer dosage interval. However, the short elimination half-lives for the drugs in animals limit the applicability of these models to humans. Importantly, there is convincing evidence in animal studies that nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity are both reduced when the same total daily dose is administered in less frequent doses. There have been at least 29 clinical trials comparing once-daily administration of aminoglycosides with conventional administration 2 to 4 times daily. In general, efficacy has not been shown to be different between regimens, although one trial showed an advantage for once-daily administration compared with administration 3 times daily. A small number of trials have shown less nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity with once-daily administration, leading several authors to suggest that there is sufficient evidence to warrant a change to once-daily administration of aminoglycosides. However, once-daily administration has not been well studied in the paediatric population, or in patients with renal failure or endocarditis, and cannot be recommended in these patients as yet. The choice of a 24-hour dosage interval is somewhat arbitrary, and the optimal interval may not necessarily be 24 hours. No studies have included dosage adjustment based on pharmacokinetic modelling methods, and the effect of this on treatment outcome needs to be assessed. The best method of administering aminoglycosides once daily is yet to be determined.
氨基糖苷类药物是治疗严重感染的重要抗菌剂。有证据表明,若要使这些药物发挥疗效,在治疗早期必须达到较高的血浆峰浓度,但长时间的高浓度可能会导致耳毒性和肾毒性。庆大霉素和妥布霉素的传统治疗目标是血浆峰浓度达到6至10毫克/升,谷浓度低于2毫克/升。近期来自体外、动物和人体研究的大量证据表明,这些目标浓度需要修正。氨基糖苷类药物具有浓度依赖性细菌杀伤作用,有较长的抗生素后效应,并可诱导革兰氏阴性菌产生适应性耐药。所有这些因素都支持使用比传统疗法给药频率更低但剂量更大的氨基糖苷类药物。体外研究支持这种方法,表明氨基糖苷类药物给药频率较低时活性更高。比较不同给药间隔的动物研究结果各异,仅略微倾向于较长的给药间隔。然而,这些药物在动物体内的消除半衰期较短,限制了这些模型对人类的适用性。重要的是,动物研究中有令人信服的证据表明,当每日总剂量以较低频率给药时,肾毒性和耳毒性都会降低。至少有29项临床试验比较了氨基糖苷类药物每日一次给药与传统的每日2至4次给药。总体而言,各治疗方案之间的疗效尚无差异,尽管有一项试验显示每日一次给药比每日3次给药更具优势。少数试验表明每日一次给药时肾毒性和耳毒性较小,这使得一些作者认为有足够的证据支持改为氨基糖苷类药物每日一次给药。然而,可以在儿科人群、肾衰竭患者或心内膜炎患者中对每日一次给药进行充分研究,目前还不能在这些患者中推荐这种给药方式。选择24小时的给药间隔有些随意,最佳间隔不一定是24小时。尚无研究包括基于药代动力学建模方法的剂量调整,需要评估其对治疗结果的影响。每日一次给药氨基糖苷类药物的最佳方法尚未确定。