Ruble D N, Eisenberg R, Higgins E T
Department of Psychology, New York University, NY 10003.
Child Dev. 1994 Aug;65(4):1095-110.
In order to explore the development of self-evaluative biases, children at 3 age levels (5-6, 7-8, 9-10) evaluated themselves or another child when given social or temporal comparison feedback. Evaluative biases were indicated by higher evaluations for the self than another, especially after failure. Children at different ages were not differentially responsive to temporal vs. social comparison information. However, evaluative bias in response to the type of evaluation differed by age; there was greater bias for general ability evaluations by older children and greater bias for specific performance evaluations by younger children. Alternative explanations for these self-other differences were minimized, as differences in visual orientation were held constant and differences in knowledge of effort were controlled statistically. Other aspects of the design as well as sex differences support a motivational interpretation of these biases. How these biases are manifested is related to children's level of understanding and concerns at different ages.
为了探究自我评价偏差的发展情况,研究人员让三个年龄组(5 - 6岁、7 - 8岁、9 - 10岁)的儿童在获得社会比较或时间比较反馈时对自己或另一名儿童进行评价。自我评价偏差表现为对自己的评价高于对他人的评价,尤其是在失败之后。不同年龄的儿童对时间比较信息和社会比较信息的反应没有差异。然而,对评价类型的反应中,自我评价偏差存在年龄差异;年龄较大的儿童在一般能力评价上的偏差更大,年龄较小的儿童在具体表现评价上的偏差更大。由于视觉方向的差异保持不变,努力知识的差异在统计上得到了控制,这些自我与他人差异的其他解释被最小化。设计的其他方面以及性别差异支持了对这些偏差的动机性解释。这些偏差的表现方式与儿童在不同年龄的理解水平和关注点有关。