Frey K S, Ruble D N
Child Dev. 1987 Aug;58(4):1066-78.
Naturalistic observations and interviews with children in kindergarten, first, second, and fourth grades (ages 5 1/2-10 years) were used to examine sex and age differences in evaluations of, and attributions to performance of, self and others. Observers coded the content of peer verbal exchanges during class work times, and the children were subsequently interviewed about their and their peers' classroom performance, as well as expectancies of performance on a novel task. Analyses of classroom observations generally supported previous laboratory findings; positive evaluation declined with grade level, and more negative self-evaluations and attributions were made by girls than by boys. In contrast, the interview measures did not show grade or sex differences in self-assessment; however, the consistency across interview and observation measures was greater at higher grade levels and for boys than for girls. Previous interpretations of age and sex differences in performance assessment are reexamined, and the possible impact of social context on evaluative statements is discussed.
通过对幼儿园、一年级、二年级和四年级(年龄在5岁半至10岁之间)儿童进行自然观察和访谈,来研究自我与他人表现评价及归因方面的性别和年龄差异。观察者对课堂作业时间里同伴言语交流的内容进行编码,随后对孩子们进行访谈,询问他们及同伴在课堂上的表现,以及对一项新任务表现的预期。课堂观察分析总体上支持了先前的实验室研究结果;积极评价随年级升高而下降,女孩比男孩做出更多消极的自我评价和归因。相比之下,访谈测量结果并未显示出自评中的年级或性别差异;然而,在较高年级以及男孩中,访谈和观察测量结果之间的一致性比女孩更高。对先前关于表现评估中年龄和性别差异的解释进行了重新审视,并讨论了社会背景对评价性陈述可能产生的影响。