Suppr超能文献

新型聚四氟乙烯胆管假体的长期通畅性。

Prolonged patency with a new-design Teflon biliary prosthesis.

作者信息

Seitz U, Vadeyar H, Soehendra N

机构信息

Department of Endoscopic Surgery, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 1994 Jun;26(5):478-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1009008.

Abstract

Clogging of biliary endoprosthesis has been a persistent problem faced by endoscopists over many years. Evidence suggests that incorporating sideholes increases the risk of plastic stents clogging. We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized study comparing 10 Fr Teflon pigtail (PT) stents with sideholes to a new design 10Fr Teflon straight stent without sideholes, designated as the "Tannenbaum" (TB) stent. Seventy-four consecutive patients were treated with the PT stent and 55 consecutive patients with the TB stent in two different periods. All patients had malignant distal biliary obstruction with jaundice. Stent insertion was successful in all patients, and a significant reduction in serum bilirubin levels was achieved. All follow-up patients, except one in the TB group, had died at the time of reporting. Median survival in the PT group was 100 days (range: 6-636 days) and 130 days (range: 3-703 days) in the TB group. Median follow-up in the PT group was 104 days (range: 6-636 days) and 141 days (range: 3-537 days) in the TB group. Statistical analysis shows significantly longer patency for the TB stent (p < 0.02). Moreover, the results of the TB stent compared favorably with the published results of metallic self-expandable biliary stents. We believe the TB stent holds great promise for the future of endoscopic biliary stenting. Prospective randomized studies comparing the TB stent with existing plastic and metal stents are, however, necessary.

摘要

多年来,胆道内支架堵塞一直是内镜医师面临的一个长期问题。有证据表明,设置侧孔会增加塑料支架堵塞的风险。我们进行了一项前瞻性、非随机研究,将有侧孔的10Fr聚四氟乙烯猪尾(PT)支架与一种新设计的无侧孔10Fr聚四氟乙烯直支架(称为“坦嫩鲍姆”(TB)支架)进行比较。在两个不同时期,74例连续患者接受了PT支架治疗,55例连续患者接受了TB支架治疗。所有患者均患有恶性远端胆管梗阻并伴有黄疸。所有患者支架置入均成功,血清胆红素水平显著降低。在报告时,除TB组的1例患者外,所有接受随访的患者均已死亡。PT组的中位生存期为100天(范围:6 - 636天),TB组为130天(范围:3 - 703天)。PT组的中位随访时间为104天(范围:6 - 636天),TB组为141天(范围:3 - 537天)。统计分析显示,TB支架的通畅时间明显更长(p < 0.02)。此外,TB支架的结果与已发表的金属自膨式胆道支架的结果相比更具优势。我们认为,TB支架在未来内镜胆道支架置入方面具有很大的前景。然而,有必要进行前瞻性随机研究,将TB支架与现有的塑料和金属支架进行比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验