• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Defining the physician's duty to warn: consensus statement of Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform.界定医生的警告义务:安大略省医疗告知义务专家小组的共识声明
CMAJ. 1998 Jun 2;158(11):1473-9.
2
Confidentiality and duty to warn the third parties in HIV/AIDS context.艾滋病背景下的保密义务及向第三方发出警示的责任。
Med Etika Bioet. 2005 Spring-Summer;12(1):2-7.
3
Back to the past in California: a temporary retreat to a Tarasoff duty to warn.回到加利福尼亚的过去:暂时回归塔萨索夫警告义务。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(4):523-8.
4
A physician's duty to warn family members of genetic risks: limiting the importance of Tarasoff.医生向家庭成员告知基因风险的责任:限制塔萨夫法则的重要性。
J Biolaw Bus. 2003;6(1):28-38.
5
The Austrian Psychotherapy Act: no legal duty to warn.
Indiana Int Comp Law Rev. 2001;11(2):469-505.
6
The limits of doctor-patient confidentiality in Canada.
Health Law Can. 1998 Nov;19(2):52-63.
7
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
8
The argument against a physician's duty to warn for genetic diseases: the conflicts created by Safer v. Estate of Pack.
J Health Care Law Policy. 1998;1(2):437-53.
9
Gathering information and casuistic analysis.
J Clin Ethics. 1993 Fall;4(3):241-5.
10
Physicians and surgeons--negligence--psychotherapist has a duty to warn an endangered victim whose peril was disclosed to psychotherapist by patient.内科医生和外科医生——过失——心理治疗师有责任警告其患者向他披露了危险的濒危受害者。
N D Law Rev. 1976;53(2):279-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation Between Malpractice Litigation and Legislation Reform in Taiwan Over a 30-Year Period.台湾30年间医疗纠纷诉讼与立法改革的相关性
Int J Gen Med. 2021 May 17;14:1889-1898. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S312640. eCollection 2021.
2
Ethical Dilemma and Management of Infertility in HIV Seropositive Discordant Couples: A Case Study in Nigeria.HIV血清反应性不一致夫妇的伦理困境与不孕症管理:尼日利亚的一个案例研究
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013 Jan;3(1):99-101. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.109460.
3
Addressing intimate partner violence with male patients: a review and introduction of pilot guidelines.与男性患者探讨亲密伴侣暴力问题:一项综述及试点指南介绍
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):2071-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0755-1. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
4
Understanding the effect of domestic violence on pregnancy, labour, and delivery.了解家庭暴力对妊娠、分娩及分娩过程的影响。
Can Fam Physician. 2000 Mar;46:505-7, 516-9.
5
Reporting intoxicated drivers.举报醉酒驾车者。
Can Fam Physician. 2000 Jan;46:68.
6
The CMA's Health Information Privacy Code: does it go too far?加拿大医学协会的健康信息隐私准则:是否走得太远了?
CMAJ. 1998 Oct 20;159(8):953-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness.
J Psychiatry Law. 1984 Fall;12(3):315-48. doi: 10.1177/009318538401200303.
2
Client-counselor confidentiality: an update of rationale, legal status, and implications.
Pers Guid J. 1982 Feb;60(6):371-5. doi: 10.1002/j.2164-4918.1982.tb00690.x.
3
Violent patients and the Tarasoff duty in private psychiatric practice.私人精神病诊疗中的暴力患者与塔萨夫义务
J Psychiatry Law. 1985 Fall-Winter;13(3-4):361-76. doi: 10.1177/0093185385013003-404.
4
Risk assessments for acute violence to third parties: a review of the literature.
Can J Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;42(10):1051-60. doi: 10.1177/070674379704201006.
5
The accuracy of predictions of violence to others.对他人暴力行为预测的准确性。
JAMA. 1993 Feb 24;269(8):1007-11.
6
More on confidentiality.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1993 Jun;7(3):123-4. doi: 10.1016/0883-9417(93)90037-w.
7
Confidentiality and the duty to warn.保密与警告义务。
CMAJ. 1993 Dec 15;149(12):1783-5.
8
Privacy, confidentiality, and privilege in psychotherapeutic relationships.心理治疗关系中的隐私、保密与特权。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1994 Apr;64(2):180-93. doi: 10.1037/h0079520.
9
Confidentiality after Tarasoff.塔萨夫案后的保密问题。
Health Soc Work. 1994 Aug;19(3):217-22. doi: 10.1093/hsw/19.3.217.
10
Confidentiality and dangerousness in the doctor-patient relationship. The position of the Canadian Psychiatric Association.
Can J Psychiatry. 1985 Jun;30(4):293-301. doi: 10.1177/070674378503000416.

界定医生的警告义务:安大略省医疗告知义务专家小组的共识声明

Defining the physician's duty to warn: consensus statement of Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform.

作者信息

Ferris L E, Barkun H, Carlisle J, Hoffman B, Katz C, Silverman M

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ. 1998 Jun 2;158(11):1473-9.

PMID:9629112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1229377/
Abstract

Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform was formed to consider the duty of Ontario physicians in circumstances where a patient threatens to kill or cause serious bodily harm to a third party. The panel was concerned about the implications of any duty to inform on the integrity of the physician-patient relationship, particularly with respect to confidentiality. The panel agreed that regulations safeguarding the confidentiality of patient information ought to be changed only if there is a critical reason for doing so, but, after deliberation, the panel members concluded that the need to protect the public from serious risk of harm is a paramount concern that should supersede the duty of confidentiality. The recommendations reported here were endorsed in principle by the panelists and the groups they represented (the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the Canadian Medical Protective Association, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the Ontario College of Family Physicians and the Ontario Medical Association) and are being implemented by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

摘要

安大略省告知义务医学专家小组的成立,是为了考量在患者威胁要杀害第三方或对其造成严重身体伤害的情况下,安大略省医生所应承担的义务。该小组担心任何告知义务会对医患关系的完整性产生影响,尤其是在保密方面。小组一致认为,只有在有关键理由的情况下,才应更改保护患者信息保密性的规定。但是,经过审议,小组成员得出结论,保护公众免受严重伤害风险的必要性是首要关切,应优先于保密义务。此处报告的建议原则上得到了小组成员及其所代表的团体(加拿大皇家内科医师与外科医师学院、加拿大医学保护协会、安大略省内科医师与外科医师学院、安大略省家庭医师学院以及安大略省医学协会)的认可,并且安大略省内科医师与外科医师学院正在实施这些建议。