Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P
Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Int J Biomed Comput. 1994 Jul;36(3):239-49. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(94)90059-0.
The role of clinical and computer based decision in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly was studied in connection with the Research Committee of the World Organization of Gastroenterology (OMGE) survey of acute abdominal pain. A total of 220 patients over the age of 65 years presenting with acute abdominal pain were included in the study at the Central Hospital of Savonlinna and at the University Hospital of Tampere. Twenty-two preoperative clinical history variables, 14 clinical signs and three tests were evaluated in a single variable and multivariate analysis to find the best combination of predictors of acute appendicitis in the aged. In order to sum up the contributions of independent diagnostic factors, a diagnostic score (DS) was built: DS = 2.81 x (rectal digital tenderness; 1 = yes, 0 = no) + 2.54 x (rigidity; 1 = yes, 0 = no) + 2.06 x (renal tenderness; 1 = no, 0 = yes) + 2.33 x (bowel sounds; 1 = normal, 2 = absent/abnormal) - 8.13. The sensitivity of preoperative clinical decision in detecting acute appendicitis in the aged was 0.79 with a specificity of 0.92, an efficiency of 0.90 and usefulness index (UI) of 0.56. At a cut-off level of -2.78 the DS reached a sensitivity of 0.84 in detecting acute appendicitis with a specificity of 0.87, an efficiency of 0.87 and UI of 0.68. When the patients with a DS value between -2.78 and -0.45 were considered as non-defined (n = 28, follow-up required before the decision to operate), the sensitivity of the computer-aided diagnosis in detecting acute appendicitis in the elderly was 0.77 with a specificity of 0.97, an efficiency of 0.96 and UI of 0.57. In the elderly patients where a leucocyte count was available (n = 157), location of pain, rectal digital tenderness and leucocyte count predicted significantly acute appendicitis. At a cut-off level of -2.62 the DS reached a sensitivity of 0.81 in detecting acute appendicitis with a specificity of 0.92, an efficiency of 0.91 and UI of 0.59. When the patients with a DS value between -2.62 and 0.06 were considered as nondefined (n = 12, follow-up required before the decision to operate), the sensitivity of the computer-aided diagnosis (leucocyte count available) in detecting acute appendicitis in the elderly improved to 0.86 with a specificity of 0.94, an efficiency of 0.93 and UI of 0.69. In our study the diagnostic scoring system for the elderly performed well considering the simple nature of its structure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
与世界胃肠病学组织(OMGE)急性腹痛调查研究委员会合作,对临床及基于计算机的诊断在老年急性阑尾炎诊断中的作用进行了研究。萨翁林纳中心医院和坦佩雷大学医院共纳入了220例65岁以上出现急性腹痛的患者。在单变量和多变量分析中评估了22个术前临床病史变量、14个临床体征和3项检查,以找出老年急性阑尾炎预测指标的最佳组合。为总结独立诊断因素的作用,构建了一个诊断评分(DS):DS = 2.81×(直肠指诊压痛;1 = 是,0 = 否)+ 2.54×(腹肌紧张;1 = 是,0 = 否)+ 2.06×(肾区压痛;1 = 否,0 = 是)+ 2.33×(肠鸣音;1 = 正常,2 = 消失/异常) - 8.13。术前临床诊断在检测老年急性阑尾炎中的敏感性为0.79,特异性为0.92,效率为0.90,有用性指数(UI)为0.56。在截断值为 -2.78时,DS在检测急性阑尾炎中的敏感性达到0.84,特异性为0.87,效率为0.87,UI为0.68。当DS值在 -2.78至 -0.45之间的患者被视为未明确(n = 28,手术决策前需随访)时,计算机辅助诊断在检测老年急性阑尾炎中的敏感性为0.77,特异性为0.97,效率为0.96,UI为0.57。在有白细胞计数的老年患者(n = 157)中,疼痛部位、直肠指诊压痛和白细胞计数对急性阑尾炎有显著预测作用。在截断值为 -2.62时,DS在检测急性阑尾炎中的敏感性达到0.81,特异性为0.92,效率为0.91,UI为0.59。当DS值在 -2.62至0.06之间的患者被视为未明确(n = 12,手术决策前需随访)时,计算机辅助诊断(有白细胞计数)在检测老年急性阑尾炎中的敏感性提高到0.86,特异性为0.94,效率为0.93,UI为0.69。在我们的研究中,考虑到其结构简单,老年诊断评分系统表现良好。(摘要截选至400字)