Suppr超能文献

白细胞计数不能提高诊断评分(DS)鉴别急性阑尾炎(AA)与非特异性腹痛(NSAP)的诊断性能。

Leucocyte Count Does Not Improve the Diagnostic Performance of a Diagnostic Score (DS) in Distinguishing Acute Appendicitis (AA) from Nonspecific Abdominal Pain (NSAP).

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3327-3339. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12171.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although, acute appendicitis (AA) and nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) are the most common diagnoses among secondary care patients with acute abdominal pain, the diagnostic performance of leucocyte count (LC) in DS (Diagnostic Score) model is rarely considered.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

As an extension of the World Organisation of Gastro-Enterology Research Committee (OMGE) acute abdominal pain study, 1,333 patients presenting with acute abdominal pain were included in the study. The clinical history and diagnostic symptoms (n=22), signs (n=14) and tests (n=3) in each patient were recorded in detail, and the collected data were related with the final diagnoses of the patients.

RESULTS

In the ROC comparison test, there was no statistically significant difference in the performance of DS (DS without LC) and DS (DS with LC). The highest sensitivities of the DS and DS tests for detecting AA were 86% (95%CI=81-90%) and 87% (95%CI=82-91%), respectively. The highest specificities of the DS and DS tests for detecting AA were 98% (95%CI=97-99%) and 98% (95%CI=96-99%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

DS could assist the clinician in differentiating AA from NSAP and other causes of acute abdominal pain. Importantly, LC does not improve the diagnostic performance of a DS in AA.

摘要

背景/目的:尽管急性阑尾炎(AA)和非特异性腹痛(NSAP)是二级保健患者急性腹痛最常见的诊断,但 DS(诊断评分)模型中白细胞计数(LC)的诊断性能很少被考虑。

患者和方法

作为世界胃肠病学组织研究委员会(OMGE)急性腹痛研究的扩展,纳入了 1333 名患有急性腹痛的患者。详细记录每位患者的临床病史和诊断症状(n=22)、体征(n=14)和检查(n=3),并将收集的数据与患者的最终诊断相关联。

结果

在 ROC 比较测试中,DS(无 LC 的 DS)和 DS(有 LC 的 DS)的性能没有统计学差异。DS 和 DS 检查检测 AA 的最高敏感度分别为 86%(95%CI=81-90%)和 87%(95%CI=82-91%)。DS 和 DS 检查检测 AA 的最高特异性分别为 98%(95%CI=97-99%)和 98%(95%CI=96-99%)。

结论

DS 可以帮助临床医生区分 AA 与 NSAP 和其他急性腹痛的原因。重要的是,LC 不会提高 DS 在 AA 中的诊断性能。

相似文献

8
Usefulness index in nonspecific abdominal pain--an aid in the diagnosis?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;47(12):1475-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.733951. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

6
A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.一种准确诊断急性阑尾炎的新方法。
World J Surg. 2005 Sep;29(9):1151-6, discussion 1157. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7853-6.
7
A diagnostic score for children with suspected appendicitis.疑似阑尾炎儿童的诊断评分
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005 Apr;390(2):164-70. doi: 10.1007/s00423-005-0545-8. Epub 2005 Feb 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验