Suppr超能文献

白细胞计数不能提高诊断评分(DS)鉴别急性阑尾炎(AA)与非特异性腹痛(NSAP)的诊断性能。

Leucocyte Count Does Not Improve the Diagnostic Performance of a Diagnostic Score (DS) in Distinguishing Acute Appendicitis (AA) from Nonspecific Abdominal Pain (NSAP).

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3327-3339. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12171.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although, acute appendicitis (AA) and nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) are the most common diagnoses among secondary care patients with acute abdominal pain, the diagnostic performance of leucocyte count (LC) in DS (Diagnostic Score) model is rarely considered.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

As an extension of the World Organisation of Gastro-Enterology Research Committee (OMGE) acute abdominal pain study, 1,333 patients presenting with acute abdominal pain were included in the study. The clinical history and diagnostic symptoms (n=22), signs (n=14) and tests (n=3) in each patient were recorded in detail, and the collected data were related with the final diagnoses of the patients.

RESULTS

In the ROC comparison test, there was no statistically significant difference in the performance of DS (DS without LC) and DS (DS with LC). The highest sensitivities of the DS and DS tests for detecting AA were 86% (95%CI=81-90%) and 87% (95%CI=82-91%), respectively. The highest specificities of the DS and DS tests for detecting AA were 98% (95%CI=97-99%) and 98% (95%CI=96-99%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

DS could assist the clinician in differentiating AA from NSAP and other causes of acute abdominal pain. Importantly, LC does not improve the diagnostic performance of a DS in AA.

摘要

背景/目的:尽管急性阑尾炎(AA)和非特异性腹痛(NSAP)是二级保健患者急性腹痛最常见的诊断,但 DS(诊断评分)模型中白细胞计数(LC)的诊断性能很少被考虑。

患者和方法

作为世界胃肠病学组织研究委员会(OMGE)急性腹痛研究的扩展,纳入了 1333 名患有急性腹痛的患者。详细记录每位患者的临床病史和诊断症状(n=22)、体征(n=14)和检查(n=3),并将收集的数据与患者的最终诊断相关联。

结果

在 ROC 比较测试中,DS(无 LC 的 DS)和 DS(有 LC 的 DS)的性能没有统计学差异。DS 和 DS 检查检测 AA 的最高敏感度分别为 86%(95%CI=81-90%)和 87%(95%CI=82-91%)。DS 和 DS 检查检测 AA 的最高特异性分别为 98%(95%CI=97-99%)和 98%(95%CI=96-99%)。

结论

DS 可以帮助临床医生区分 AA 与 NSAP 和其他急性腹痛的原因。重要的是,LC 不会提高 DS 在 AA 中的诊断性能。

相似文献

2
Gender-specific Performance of a Diagnostic Score in Acute Appendicitis.
In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3687-3703. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12217.
3
Pediatric Acute Appendicitis Score in Children With Acute Abdominal Pain (AAP).
Anticancer Res. 2021 Jan;41(1):297-306. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14776.
5
A Diagnostic Score (DS) in the Difficult Diagnosis of Non-specific Abdominal Pain (NSAP).
In Vivo. 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):2729-2738. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12557.
6
Acute appendicitis in patients over the age of 65 years; comparison of clinical and computer based decision making.
Int J Biomed Comput. 1994 Jul;36(3):239-49. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(94)90059-0.
8
Usefulness index in nonspecific abdominal pain--an aid in the diagnosis?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;47(12):1475-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.733951. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
9
Seasonal variations of acute appendicitis and nonspecific abdominal pain in Finland.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):4037-42. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.4037.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of Prediction Models in Diagnosis of Acute Diverticulitis.
In Vivo. 2023 Nov-Dec;37(6):2597-2608. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13367.
2
A Simple Prediction Score for Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis.
In Vivo. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):2287-2296. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12958.
3
History-taking, Clinical Signs, Tests and Scores for Detection of Non-organic Dyspepsia (NOD) Among Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain (AAP).
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2021 Jul 3;1(4):265-274. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10034. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
4
A Diagnostic Score (DS) in the Difficult Diagnosis of Non-specific Abdominal Pain (NSAP).
In Vivo. 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):2729-2738. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12557.
5
Gender-specific Performance of a Diagnostic Score in Acute Appendicitis.
In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3687-3703. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12217.

本文引用的文献

4
The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review.
BMC Med. 2011 Dec 28;9:139. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-139.
5
An evaluation of the utility of additional tests in the preoperative diagnostics of acute appendicitis.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Nov;395(8):1061-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0565-x. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
6
A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
World J Surg. 2005 Sep;29(9):1151-6, discussion 1157. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7853-6.
7
A diagnostic score for children with suspected appendicitis.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005 Apr;390(2):164-70. doi: 10.1007/s00423-005-0545-8. Epub 2005 Feb 19.
9
Diagnostic score in appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Eskelinen score) in patients in whom acute appendicitis is suspected.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Jun;389(3):213-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0436-9. Epub 2003 Nov 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验