Pitney M R, Allan R M, Giles R W, McLean D, McCredie M, Randell T, Walsh W F
Eastern Heart Clinic, Prince Henry Hospital, Little Bay, Sydney, Australia.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Dec;24(7):1660-3. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90171-6.
This three-part study examined the feasibility of reducing operator radiation exposure during coronary angioplasty.
As case loads and complexity increase, some cardiologists are receiving increasing radiation scatter doses. Techniques to reduce this are therefore becoming more important.
First, the determinants of the operator dose were assessed by measuring the differences in scatter dose with different camera views. The relative contribution of fluoroscopy as opposed to cine was then quantified. Finally, operators were provided with these data, and subsequent changes in technique were evaluated.
Left anterior oblique views resulted in 2.6 to 6.1 times the operator dose of equivalently angled right anterior oblique views. Increasing steepness of the left anterior oblique view also resulted in a progressive increase in operator dose, with left anterior oblique 90 degrees causing eight times the dose of left anterior oblique 30 degrees and three times that of left anterior oblique 60 degrees. In the 45 coronary angioplasty cases prospectively analyzed, fluoroscopy was found to be a greater source of total radiation than cine by a 6.3:1 ratio (range 1.1 to 15.8). Once operators were made aware of the importance of left anterior oblique fluoroscopy, there was a marked reduction in its use. When this was not feasible, there was a reduction in the steepness of the angulation. Left anterior oblique fluoroscopy during angioplasty of the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries was reduced from 40% of total screening time to approximately 5%, and left anterior oblique angulation for fluoroscopy during angioplasty of the right coronary artery decreased from 43.6 degrees (+/- 9.1 degrees) to 29.4 degrees (+/- 2.2 degrees). Success rates (90% vs. 89%) and screening times (19.5 vs. 20.7 min) remained unchanged in 200 coronary angioplasties performed after the study. Average operator radiation dose (measured by radiation badges worn under lead at waist level) was reduced from 32.6 to 14.3 microSv/operator per week despite a slight increase in case load.
Fluoroscopy is the major source of total radiation exposure during coronary angioplasty, with left anterior oblique views providing the highest dose. Modification of views is feasible and will result in significant reduction of operator radiation dose.
这项分为三个部分的研究探讨了在冠状动脉成形术期间降低术者辐射暴露的可行性。
随着病例数量和复杂性的增加,一些心脏病专家接受的辐射散射剂量越来越高。因此,减少这种剂量的技术变得越发重要。
首先,通过测量不同摄像角度下散射剂量的差异来评估术者剂量的决定因素。然后对透视与电影摄影的相对贡献进行量化。最后,向术者提供这些数据,并评估随后技术的变化。
左前斜位导致术者接受的剂量是角度相当的右前斜位的2.6至6.1倍。左前斜位角度增大也导致术者剂量逐渐增加,左前斜90度时的剂量是左前斜30度时的8倍,是左前斜60度时的3倍。在对45例冠状动脉成形术病例进行的前瞻性分析中,发现透视是总辐射的更大来源,与电影摄影相比,比例为6.3:1(范围为1.1至15.8)。一旦术者意识到左前斜位透视的重要性,其使用就会显著减少。当这不可行时,角度的陡度会降低。左前降支和左旋支冠状动脉成形术期间的左前斜位透视从总筛查时间的40%减少至约5%,右冠状动脉成形术期间透视的左前斜位角度从43.6度(±9.1度)降至29.4度(±2.2度)。在研究后进行的200例冠状动脉成形术中,成功率(分别为90%和89%)和筛查时间(分别为19.5分钟和20.7分钟)保持不变。尽管病例数量略有增加,但术者平均辐射剂量(通过佩戴在腰部铅衣下的辐射剂量计测量)从每周32.6微希沃特降至14.3微希沃特。
透视是冠状动脉成形术期间总辐射暴露的主要来源,左前斜位提供的剂量最高。改变角度是可行的,并且会显著降低术者辐射剂量。