Hatch S W, Richman J E
New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA 02115.
J Am Optom Assoc. 1994 Sep;65(9):637-41.
Stereopsis testing is commonly used to assess the presence and level of binocular vision. A new series of stereopsis tests requiring no polarized goggles are available in the form of the Titmus Stereo Test, the Stereo Reindeer Test, the Random Dot Butterfly, the Random Dot Figures, and the Random E, Circle, Square. These polarized-free tests employ a special prismatic printing process creating a panagraphic presentation, i.e., a separate image is presented to each eye without the need for polarization. The purpose of this study was to compare the polarized-free stereo tests with their traditional polarized counterparts.
Thirty four subjects, including several persons with strabismus, ages 10-35 years, were each tested with the polarized and polarized-free versions of the Titmus, Reindeer, Butterfly, and Figures. Twenty nine of these subjects were tested with the Random Dot E. Half the subjects were tested first with polarized-free and half were tested first with polarized tests. Tests were performed according to manufacturer instructions by the same examiner in clinical settings.
The results (matched pair ranked correlation coefficients) indicate that the polarized-free tests were highly correlated (r = 0.997, r = 0.998, r = 0.997, r = 1.00, and r = 1.00 respectively) with the polarized comparison tests. No significant difference (Wilcoxon Ranked Sign) in the stereopsis level was obtained between the two versions of the tests.
We conclude that these five polarized-free tests were just as valid in measuring the subjects' stereopsis as their traditional polarized version. The use of goggle-free testing has potential clinical advantages, e.g., testing of young children who will not wear the glasses or the improved observation of the ocular alignment during stereopsis testing.
立体视测试常用于评估双眼视觉的存在及程度。一系列无需偏振眼镜的新型立体视测试已问世,包括Titmus立体视测试、驯鹿立体视测试、随机点蝴蝶测试、随机点图形测试以及随机点E、圆形、方形测试。这些无偏振测试采用特殊的棱镜印刷工艺,形成全景式呈现,即无需偏振就能为每只眼睛呈现单独的图像。本研究的目的是比较无偏振立体视测试与传统的偏振测试。
34名年龄在10至35岁之间的受试者,包括几名斜视患者,分别接受了Titmus、驯鹿、蝴蝶和图形测试的偏振版和无偏振版测试。其中29名受试者接受了随机点E测试。一半受试者先进行无偏振测试,另一半先进行偏振测试。测试由同一名检查者在临床环境中按照制造商说明进行。
结果(配对等级相关系数)表明,无偏振测试与偏振对照测试高度相关(分别为r = 0.997、r = 0.998、r = 0.997、r = 1.00和r = 1.00)。两种测试版本在立体视水平上未获得显著差异(Wilcoxon秩和检验)。
我们得出结论,这五项无偏振测试在测量受试者立体视方面与传统的偏振版本同样有效。无眼镜测试具有潜在的临床优势,例如,可对不愿戴眼镜的幼儿进行测试,或在立体视测试期间更好地观察眼位。