Suppr超能文献

Comparison of two rapid enzyme immunoassays with standard enzyme immunoassay and latex agglutination for the detection of human rotavirus in stools.

作者信息

Steele A D, Williams M M, Bos P, Peenze I

机构信息

Department of Virology, Medical University of Southern Africa, Medunsa.

出版信息

J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1994 Jun;12(2):117-20.

PMID:7963340
Abstract

We evaluated the performance of six commercially available immunoassays for their ability to detect rotaviruses in stool specimens. Four of the assays were enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), including two rapid enzyme immunoassays (Testpack, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago and Pinpoint, Cambridge Biomedical, UK), and the remaining two were latex agglutination tests. A total of 100 specimens from children with gastroenteritis were tested with the commercial immunoassays and compared with electron microscopy (EM) and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) as reference tests for the detection of rotavirus. Discordant results were further evaluated by a standard blocking ELISA. The rapid EIAs were found to be highly sensitive (100% for the Testpack and 97% for the Pinpoint) and more sensitive than the other immunoassays tested. High specificity was also recorded with both rapid EIAs (96% and 100% for Testpack and Pinpoint, respectively). The rapid EIA tests were easy to perform, required no specialized equipment, and could yield a result in less than 15 min. The results show that each of the commercial assays evaluated could accurately detect rotavirus in the stools of children with gastroenteritis, although the suitability of choice of assay will ultimately depend upon the requirements of the individual laboratory.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验