• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低风险信息的价值。

The value of risk-reducing information.

作者信息

Woodward R S, Boxerman S B

机构信息

Health Administration Program, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 1994 Jun;18(3):111-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00997289.

DOI:10.1007/BF00997289
PMID:7964217
Abstract

This manuscript integrates the utility-increasing advantages of risk reductions into well-known value-of-information justifications for executive information systems (EIS). Accordingly, even some EISs which never pay for themselves financially can be advantageous if they sufficiently reduce the uncertainty of net income for "risk averse" hospitals. The manuscript demonstrates the potential importance of risk reductions in the context of a hypothetical hospital administrator charged with selecting among alternative managed care contracts, each with uncertain outcomes. An administrator representing a hospital with diminishing marginal utility from income, a standard interpretation of risk-aversion, may find that an otherwise unprofitable EIS reduces income variations (risk) sufficiently to justify its purchase.

摘要

本手稿将降低风险带来的效用增加优势,融入到了知名的管理信息系统(EIS)信息价值依据之中。因此,即使某些EIS在财务上无法实现自身盈利,但如果它们能充分降低“风险厌恶型”医院净收入的不确定性,那么这些EIS也是具有优势的。该手稿展示了在一个假设情境中降低风险的潜在重要性,在此情境下,医院管理者负责在替代管理式医疗合同中进行选择,每个合同的结果都具有不确定性。一位代表边际收入效用递减医院(风险厌恶的标准解释)的管理者可能会发现,一个原本无利可图的EIS能够充分减少收入波动(风险),从而证明购买它是合理的。

相似文献

1
The value of risk-reducing information.降低风险信息的价值。
J Med Syst. 1994 Jun;18(3):111-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00997289.
2
Providers beware: managed care contracts can be tricky.提供者请注意:管理式医疗合同可能很棘手。
Hosp Health Netw. 1994 Feb 5;68(3):72.
3
Financial valuation of incentive arrangements in managed care contracts: a real options approach.管理式医疗合同中激励安排的财务估值:一种实物期权方法。
J Health Care Finance. 2001 Fall;28(1):39-60.
4
A new kind of pressure: getting ready for capitation.一种新型压力:为按人头付费做好准备。
Health Syst Rev. 1996 Mar-Apr;29(2):26, 28-30.
5
Understanding capitation and at-risk contracting.
Health Syst Lead. 1994 Mar;1(1):4-16.
6
The money trap. Four pitfalls of contract management system integration and how to avoid them.
Healthc Inform. 1998 Sep;15(9):109-10, 112, 114.
7
Taking control of managed care contracting.掌控管理式医疗合同。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1996 Dec;50(12):40, 43-5.
8
Use these strategies to ease into capitation.
Capitation Manag Rep. 1997 Feb;4(2):29-32.
9
Integrated delivery systems. Managing the risk of capitation.综合医疗服务体系。管理按人头付费的风险。
Calif Hosp. 1994 Jul-Aug;8(4):29-30.
10
Conducting a managed care contract review.
Healthc Financ Manage. 1998 Jan;52(1):40-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimum investments in project evaluations: when are cost-effectiveness analyses cost-effective?项目评估中的最优投资:成本效益分析何时具有成本效益?
J Med Syst. 1996 Dec;20(6):385-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02257282.

本文引用的文献

1
Benefit-cost analysis of hospital information systems: the state of the (non) art.医院信息系统的效益成本分析:(非)艺术现状
J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1988 Summer;11(1):30-92.
2
Administrative costs in U.S. hospitals.美国医院的管理成本。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 5;329(6):400-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308053290606.